They said “without excluding” not “without including”

I’m talking about the implementation of RAID5/6 for BTRFS specifically.

The RAID56 feature provides striping and parity over several devices, same as the traditional RAID5/6. There are some implementation and design deficiencies that make it unreliable for some corner cases and the feature should not be used in production, only for evaluation or testing. The power failure safety for metadata with RAID56 is not 100%.

BTRFS documentation

Do you know if the documentation is outdated? Has this changed recently?

I’m pretty sure it’s an automated system that makes these issues. The accounts looked like bots. However, that only makes it even weirder.

It used to eat data but that’s not been the case for a few years

Isn’t that a RAID5/6 thing?

Do you mean cowbee?

Seems fair, I don’t think this is PTB

People often use a ridiculous amount of emoji’s in their readme, perhaps seeing it was a README triggered something in the LLM to talk like a readme?

They don’t, because it’s not an actual issue for any human reading it. The README contains the data and the repo is just for coordination, but the LLM doesn’t understand that.

Here’s a good video about it

I’ve always imagined it being the Venn diagram intersection of high IQ and arrogance, is that correct?

For the people who don’t know who he is

Ben-Gvir is a settler in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, whose “political background lies in Kahanism - a violently racist movement that supports the expulsion of Palestinians from their lands”. He has a long history of anti-Arab activism leading to dozens of indictments and at least eight convictions of crimes including incitement to racism and support for, as well as possession of propaganda of, a terrorist organization (the now illegal political party Kach). As a lawyer, he is known for defending Jews accused of Jewish extremist terrorism on trial in Israel.

(Wikipedia)

Maybe so you can hire people from overseas?

Yes, but you shouldn’t be using Chrome anyway 🤷

He did approve blessing same sex marriage which is an improvement compared to the previous pope who called it evil, so he was compassionate compared to that.

But yeah, standards for popes are very very low.

Yes and then he apologized and then did it again a couple weeks later

deleted by creator

You might not have noticed but 90% of these posts come from the same user

?

And he is also elected (not by the people, but elected nontheless)