![](https://fedia.io/media/78/8f/788f9f4b9901048b49efac2ca5fcb2e7ddb9a6ad268ea97b8a7a3abb9603e517.jpg)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c991377a-7429-40ad-b1ea-7bf9ed0d1eb6.webp)
The downvotes :(
Maybe that’s just their way of being weird, at least the occurrences are isolated.
unremarkable
The downvotes :(
Maybe that’s just their way of being weird, at least the occurrences are isolated.
Cost of Attendance, Undergraduate, Brown University: Full Time Off-Campus. $71,412
Yet, they have billions in investment funds.
I’m 110% in favor of higher education, but not at schools that are run like an exploitation racket. Even state schools, that receive loads of Federal funding, are exploiting students financially. It’s insane that it has gotten this bad. Soon, the upper class will be the only ones who will be able to afford an education. In light of everything else, that almost feels intentional.
Apologies for the slight digression here, but institutes of higher education that are overflowing with cash make me see red. You’re a school, that’s not how any of this is supposed to work.
I believe it was you, and the Irish.
Oh shit, I just realized why they’re mentioned. Yield, for they have the high ground, and cannot be sieged.
That dude’s going straight home to beat his wife. Statistically.
Idea: Encourage police officers to marry the police union.
Strike, and strike again, deep into the heart of Mordor. Ignore the cries of those who only wish to keep their coffers full.
Slava Ukraini
They only killed a small percentage of the people who purchased them. Please, think of the innocent shareholders.
ETA: Look at the downvotes on this new post. The one on my comment arrived instantly. Not normal on this site.
Possible lodging, no food.
It was quite a few years before I could afford a month’s worth of food in one go, and I was too old to join by then. The way they (people my own age) handled telling me that I was too poor to join their club, left a lasting impression.
I’d avoided the exact quote for the reasons in your comment, but it works so well in this context that it’s tough to let go of entirely. Glad you didn’t just see it as a misquote! Nice work helping to keep the record straight.
Those who trade privacy for security achieve neither.
Reminds me of the Conservation Corps. As much as I support the concept, programs like this are not for people who need money.
Thank you, democracy fans in the Netherlands!
That was my first question as well, along with counting the many ways this could have turned out horribly. The article calls it a prank, but this had disastrous potential. Not just for the company; anything that goes wrong in that sector, in the way of IP theft and the like, will be blamed on the prankster first, until proven otherwise.
The casual way it’s discussed, and calling it a prank, gets under my skin a little. Am I alone in that?
Think of how much policy will need to be typed up because of this, and again, the potential for disaster, on both sides. I’d be floored if a former employee did this to my team, and I wouldn’t care if it was a joke, at all. At the very least, the dude would be trespassed, if for no other reason than to show he’s been warned.
I’m just going to imagine that this guy wanted more funding allocated for his buddies in the IT department, and did this as a parting gift.
It’s Just a Prank, Bro: Office Edition
Apologies for the confusion, and the late reply. I see what you mean; my comment could have been worded far better.
Exactly because of stuff like the above, I’m just returning from a long break from social media. I’ll do better. Thanks for highlighting the issue, take care.
I don’t think it would be fun to be a serf, and I haven’t idealized it. I made a dumb joke, based on a trope, and a couple of you guys just can’t accept that, and have to leave a smug reply.
I worked in manual labor for decades, in worse conditions than any serf ever experienced, right up until my body fell apart. 20 years ago, I would have traded my life with nearly any serf, in a heartbeat, and I’d be far better off now.
But, I’m sure you could show little old me what hard living really is. If only I knew!
Had a friend come out to me just yesterday, and his story is identical. So much so that I had to creep your account to make sure you weren’t him.
The similarity doesn’t tell me that two people are going through this, it tells me that statistically, tens of thousands must be. Depressing, but yours is good news. Rickety parental unit aside, I hope you’re feeling as great as my buddy is; I could both see and hear that a tremendous weight had been lifted from his soul.
Best of luck to you and what this new future holds!
It was meant as a joke. Capitalism isn’t feudalism in new cloths, either, but that gets a pass. I think you just hate ducks.
Besides, serfdom went on for centuries, under hundreds of different lords and rulers, in just as many environments. Your description covers one type, not all types. It’s disingenuous to paint it black and white, just because you have a problem with ducks.
Serfs in Gucci belts.
Ah, who am I kidding? Serfs had a far better work/life balance than most people in the developed world today. They had to use regular belts, though, which is embarrassing.
As another commenter hinted at, “Thinkpad” used to mean IBM laptop; Lenovo bought the name (and PC division of IBM) for that reason, and they don’t mind if people think they’re still IBM, because OG Thinkpads were the bomb. This is what I was getting at.
It’s bananas that the IBM association is just gone now, because the name was huge in the 90s. Sometimes a fella can really feel old.
PSA: Lenovo has gotten in trouble for hidden Chinese malware on their laptops, multiple times.
Careful with their hardware; it’s no longer the company that built the name.
deleted by creator