Somewhiteguy

Summoned from the underpants.

Man, it’s going to have a good time recalling all of those homescreen screenshots that I keep accidentally making because I can never remember if the power options are on the Power+VolumeUp or Power+VolumeDown combination.

It’s a free wifi service provided by the airline while on the flight. One ad, when most other places are charging $10-20 per flight? I’ll watch the single ad. I’d rather that then someone, say, injecting adverts into sites and services. which is very possible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XNDM4eAn1U

Most people already have the number, the point I make in asking is to show them that I don’t need to be their messenger. You can call my mother/father/grandmother yourself. If they’re asking about my wife/kids, I’ll just say “Sure” and then forget because I’m apparently a goldfish. Most people who say “Tell them hi” are my parent’s and grandparent’s friends anyway. I don’t give out a true friend’s number, I agree that is not good.

I did until mobile phones became the norm, now I ask if they need her number to call. It made sense before phones were everywhere and you didn’t make it to see everyone, but send a text yourself. My name isn’t SMS.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-103 So, they’re claiming commercial rights as an individual. I’m not sure any judge would want to deal with someone who doesn’t understand the difference between individual and commercial. All of these I’ve seen deal with fighting their ability to drive a vehicle or child-support, so if it’s related to that the judge wasn’t getting puckered. He was getting ready to beat you with a mallet.

Is it still a thing? The website doesn’t go anywhere and I can’t find the app. All I can actually find are a few articles talking about how ridiculous it is to have a $2 subscription service on water fountains.

Toes.

If she was sitting up, her feet would be on top of her legs crossed. She then puts her arms through her crossed legs, and rolls backwards onto her shoulders.

“Finance company owner purchases second home to get away from family”

There is the updated title. Not just a mother, a mother that owns their own company and wants to get away from family obligations. Do what you have to do to find peace, but this title does not express what is actually happening.

I had one of these until I got married. You will wake up, many times in a panic. Good times.

I’m actively trying the launcher as an alternative to Nova (I was still on Version 7, so might as well start jumping ship before things happen). I got very used to widgets on other launchers, so this is nice if you like that “clean” look and actually remember what your apps are named. I’m bad at both of those ideas. Good launcher otherwise.

So, are we hoping this gets deleted as well to keep the tradition alive, or is this hopefully going to change moderation? I’m confused on how to feel about this.

There’s a link to this article. I haven’t vetted anything, so take it for what it is.

Imagine the Super-Bug that would be created from this kind of thing.

Either it would destroy the world, or New York would become a complete haven of people totally immune to nearly all diseases.

It is definitely this. “You’re not profilable, how do you expect us to sell you to advertisers?”

That’s the truth. Unless you’re sporting a trusted linux distro, and a dumb phone, something is always liatening.

Only log into these websites in a private browser you trust and they can’t “peek” in as readily.

Reading the whole Section, it seems they are leaning on this one phrase:

"SEC. 505. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any citizen may commence a civil action on his own behalf "(1) against any person (including (i) the United States, and (ii) any other governmental instrumentality or agency to the extent permitted by the eleventh amendment to the Constitution) who is alleged to be in violation of (A) an effluent standard or limitation under this Act or (B) an order issued by the Administrator or a State with respect to such a standard or limitation,

Which is duplicated here in some part here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1365

They’re very good at looking at the letter of the law without considering the context or purpose of why it was written. Any number of logical fallacies are used to jump every shark possible.