it’s literally a broken chain.
it’s literally a broken chain.
Literally a broken chain.
You could make a movie called ‘The Folly of the Phallus’ where a man shoots himself in the foot everytime he feels emotions and people would idolize the main characters and complain that the message wasn’t clear enough.
The reason for the VAT (in the USSR it was called a Turnover Tax. They’re the same thing but a VAT does not tax means of production) was how incredibly simple it was to administer. Tax fraud could be kept relatively low for any given level of administration if a VAT was used instead of an income tax, for example. Many modern governments do this today for the same reason.
The USSR was constantly in a struggle to build an effective administration (a good book on this is Origins of the Great Purges ) while fighting what we today would call Bullshit Jobs and local strongmen.
Just a reminder that the USSR had a VAT as its main tax revenue for almost its entire existence.
The evidence we have is that Swiss banks are likely key in how sanctions against Russia are being avoided.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-20/swiss-imports-of-russian-gold-climb-to-highest-since-april-2020
it depends on what you mean by BRICS, the EU, and imperialism.
Usually what people are referring to is the breakdown of something called Dollar Recycling and usually this gets lumped in with the specific way the US ruling class impose their economic will over the rest of the world.
Often people start with a history lesson beginning just after WWII, and I can link a video if you’d be interested, but in short:
sidenote: It’s not actually “Argentina” or “Brazil” doing this. The businesses in these countries put in purchase requests for US Dollars at the Chicago Clearing House or some other bank, and then they pay a fee to exchange their currency for US Dollars, and then trade with each other, and then pay the bank to exchange it back.
sidenote 2: Sometimes these businesses go to their own country’s central banks to exchange the money so the central bank acts as a middle man of sorts.
.
If a business in the US wants to buy something from abroad, it can just do so without having to worry about where to get US Dollars from since it always uses US Dollars anyway. When French businesses, for example, wants to buy something from abroad, they has to first sell something to get the US Dollars they needs (often to the US) or they have to use a US bank or clearing house to exchange Euros for US Dollars.
Chinese businesses is becoming the largest trading partners of many countries, not the US ones anymore. So many countries can get US Dollars without having to sell to US businesses.
What is likely going to happen is that the BRICS countries (probably better referred to simply as the China Trading Block since all of the other countries are in a subservient role) will make their own crypto currency similar to Tether which is backed by US Dollars that China has in abundance.
This means that there is now a competing currency to the US Dollar but which can easily be exchanged for US Dollars without needing to use any US Banks at all. Thus the power the US businesses have will be weakened.
That’s about what I expected. It’s the same in the west. Very few people are ardent neoliberals but many just support their team (if they are politically active at all).
i watch kevin walmsley for the info he provides. i (and everyone else) can think for themselves haha. the info he shares is good but his conclusions and biases are wrong and can easily just be ignored.
as for my other comment, i do still believe that and i have actual evidence of it now.
sounds a bit anarchist
I don’t think slur is the appropriate word to use here.
There are people who simply support China because it isn’t the US. For example, one of the best sources for economic news about China is Inside China Business. He lives in China and supports China but he literally thinks that the reason for China’s success is that God is rewarding them for being the largest Christian nation and punishing the US for abandoning the faith. I don’t know what other word to describe this guy and people like him as.
am i one of these few MLs?
When I was studying Standard Chinese I was talking to my tutor about the youth organization and he said it’s basicall required to be a member to qualify for state assistance. Kind of like a formality like selective service is in the US. So for that org I would guess about 99% of the people are not ardent MLs.
You also bring up a good point that was really matters is if the public support the party and if the party is supporting the people.
I agree with your conclusion very, very much.
This wasn’t meant to call anyone out but just genuine curiosity. Some of the sources I get news about China from are definitely not supporting China for any reason other than it’s not the US. (Inside China Business is a great channel but he literaly thinks China is being rewarded by God for being the largest Christian nation and America is being punished for abandoning the faith).
I think it’s probably less than half. Some of the big names who make their living talking should be thought of skepitcally but as long as they support outcomes we want it doesn’t matter too much.
Not sure if what I said makes sense tho
i have a source now if you are genuinely curious.
ah ok. my apologies :D
is this a response to me?
i’m a bit confused.
i don’t know what the CPC have to do with the question of whether people on the internet should say they like Russia or Ukraine in a war.
but i do agree that most western leftists seem to be rather christian in their view of socialist movements. they all care about making sure they have the correct interpretation and have a judas who betrayed the movement. (the anarchists have lenin, the trots have salin, the stalinists have kruschev, the maoists have deng, etc. etc.)
yes.
it won’t come from any existing socialist state tho, it will come from the contradictions that are emerging in the global order.
there has been exactly once in which an existing socialist state brought about socialism in another country and it was WWII. the rest have been internal. here are some videos you can watch which take a materialist analysis of the current situation in the context of past wars and revolutions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWrgN33ZOQQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiqxGdY5_V4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1RRw6kDNWk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C319X8x90mc
you shouldn’t.
there are many people who call themselves marxist-leninists on this site who do not subscribe to anything marx or lenin had to say about inter-imperialist conflict.
communists and marxists and leninists always seek peace above all else.
the only war worth fighting is class war and the inter-imperialist rivalry won’t benefit the working class.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/feb/08.htm
as a bonus, this speech is particularly prophetic. lenin calls calls out basically the next 100 years of US foreign policy in 1917.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/may/14.htm
the only thing the people who call ourselves marxists leninists should be hoping for is a quick peace, a lasting peace, and a humiliating peace for both sides so that the army mutinies and makes proletarian seizure of state power possible (like happened in russia, angola, mozambique, etc.)
even tho virtue signalling is what most people here support, they have decided to support the russian government who made domestic abuse entirely legal and who criminalize queer identities freely expressing. condemning russia’s government is not endorsing ukraine’s.
ai art is art because people are mad about it.
jokes aside, i think that machine art is going to basically just replace clip art and the like. it’s like what happened to pottery. there are still artisinal potters (i love handmade pottery and the craft itself) but for everyday dinner plates you don’t seek the connection and craftsmanship. you just need a plate.
some art has use-value as decoration (easily replaced with machines) and other art is about personal, emotional, or political communication (even if it could be replaced, it wouldn’t be.)