• mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly? We can debate each separately. We don’t need a single magic number that we try to apply to all circumstances.

    I don’t object to the specific number, I object to making it match a different number as the reason.

    Heck, there are probably a lot of 16 year olds that are mature enough to responsibly handle a firearm, that doesn’t mean we should change all the age requirements for everything to 16 either.

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Are you in favor a system where tests are administered to verify that people are competent enough to do adult things or do you think different ages for different things is appropriate?

      • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it depends on the thing. I don’t want us to say anyone can fly a plane without a license just because they are old enough and I also think that a some kind of test to see if someone is responsible enough to drink would be stupid when age is good enough for that.