When they talk about ranked ballots they’re actually talking about the instant run-off ranked voting system that produces the same aggressive politics, defacto 2-party system, lack of climate action. It’s s actually a downgrade over fptp as it makes it harder for the independents/smaller parties to win seats.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 days ago

    It’s s actually a downgrade over fptp as it makes it harder for the independents/smaller parties to win seats.

    Is there a mathematical explanation for why this is the case?

    • AlolanVulpix@lemmy.caM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I disagree with the notion that IRV is strictly “a downgrade” over FPTP.

      Both FPTP and IRV are winner-take-all systems. However, IRV is superior to FPTP, as the spoiler effect is mitigated. We still have wasted votes in any winner-take-all system, but perhaps of varying degrees of severity.

      However, proportional representation (e.g., STV or MMP) is the only way to guarantee fair representation for all.