In the piece — titled “Can You Fool a Self Driving Car?” — Rober found that a Tesla car on Autopilot was fooled by a Wile E. Coyote-style wall painted to look like the road ahead of it, with the electric vehicle plowing right through it instead of stopping.

The footage was damning enough, with slow-motion clips showing the car not only crashing through the styrofoam wall but also a mannequin of a child. The Tesla was also fooled by simulated rain and fog.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    407
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Notice how they’re mad at the video and not the car, manufacturer, or the CEO. It’s a huge safety issue yet they’d rather defend a brand that obviously doesn’t even care about their safety. Like, nobody is gonna give you a medal for being loyal to a brand.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      To be fair, and ugh, I hate to have to stand up for these assholes, but…

      To be fair, their claim is that the video was a lie and that the results were manufactured. They believe that Teslas are actually safe and that Rober was doing some kind of Elon Musk takedown trying to profit off the shares getting tanked and promote a rival company.

      They actually do have a little bit of evidence for those claims:

      1. The wall changes between different camera angles. In some angles the wall is simply something painted on canvas. In other angles it’s a solid styrofoam wall.
      2. The inside the car view in the YouTube video doesn’t make it clear that autopilot mode is engaged.
      3. Mark Rober chose to use Autopilot mode rather than so-called Full Self Driving.

      But, he was interviewed about this, and he provided additional footage to clear up what happened.

      1. They did the experiment twice, once with a canvas wall, then a few weeks later with a styrofoam wall. The car smashed right into the wall the first time, but it wasn’t very dramatic because the canvas just blew out of the way. They wanted a more dramatic video for YouTube, so they did it again with a styrofoam wall so you could see the wall getting smashed. This included pre-weakening the wall so that when the car hit it, it smashed a dramatic Looney-Tunes looking hole in the wall. When they made the final video, they included various cuts from both the first and second attempts. The car hit the wall both times, but it wasn’t just one single hit like it was shown in the video.

      2. There’s apparently a “rainbow” path shown when the car is in Autopilot mode. [RAinbows1?!? DEI!?!?!?!] In the cut they posted to YouTube, you couldn’t see this rainbow path. But, Rober posted a longer cut of the car hitting the wall where it was visible. So, it wasn’t that autopilot was off, but in the original YouTube video you couldn’t tell.

      3. He used Autopilot mode because from his understanding (as a Tesla owner (this was his personal vehicle being tested)), Full Self Driving requires you to enter a destination address. He just wanted to drive down a closed highway at high speed, so he used Autopilot instead. In his understanding as a Tesla owner and engineer, there would be no difference in how the car dealt with obstacles in autopilot mode vs. full self driving, but he admitted that he hadn’t tested it, so it’s possible that so-called Full Self-Driving would have handled things differently.

      Anyhow, these rabid MAGA Elon Fanboys did pick up on some minor inconsistencies in his original video. Rober apprently didn’t realize what a firestorm he was wading into. His intention was to make a video about how cool LIDAR is, but with a cool scene of a car smashing through a wall as the hook. He’d apparently been planning and filming the video for half a year, and he claims it just happened to get released right at the height of the time when Teslas are getting firebombed.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Kinda depends on the fact, right? Plenty of factual things piss me off, but I’d argue I’m correct to be pissed off about them.

        • OnASnowyEvening@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Right. Just because sometimes we have to accept something, doesn’t mean we have to like it.

          (Though the other commenter implied people commonly or always angered by fact, but then we have nothing to talk about.)

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      These people haven’t found any individual self identity.

      An attack on the brand is an attack on them. Reminds me of the people who made Stars Wars their meaning and crumbled when a certain trilogy didn’t hold up.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        86
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        An attack on the brand is an attack on them.

        Thus it ever is with Conservatives. They make $whatever their whole identity, and so take any critique of $whatever as a personal attack against themselves.

        I blame evangelical religions’ need for martyrdom for this.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they’re sure trying to do so, it’s going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can’t and won’t compromise. I know, I’ve tried to deal with them.” ― Barry Goldwater

        • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 day ago

          You pretty much hit the nail on the head. These people have no identity or ability to think for themselves because they never needed either one. The church will do all your thinking for you, and anything it doesn’t cover will be handled by Fox News. Be like everyone else and fit in, otherwise… you have to start thinking for yourself. THE HORROR.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 day ago

        The term you are looking for is “external locus of identity”. And, yes.

      • jumperalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So literally every single above average sports fan?

        The pathological need to be part of a group so bad it overwhelmes all reason is a feature I have yet to understand. And I say that as someone who can recognize in myself those moments when I feel the pull to be part of an in group.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s just tribalism in general. Humans are tribal by nature as a survival mechanism. In modern culture, that manifests as behaviors like being a rabid sports fan.

        • DogWater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s evolutionary. Humans are social pack animals. The need for inclusion was evolved into us over however many years.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 day ago

      The styrofoam wall had a pre-cut hole to weaken it, and some people are using it as a gotcha proving the video was faked. It would be funny if it wasn’t so pathetic.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but it’s styrofoam. You could literally run through it. And I’m sure they did that more as a safety measure so that it was guaranteed to collapse so nobody would be injured.

        But at the same time it still drove through a fucking wall. The integrity doesn’t mean shit because it drove through a literal fucking wall.

      • scops@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        For more background, Rober gave an interview and admitted that they ran the test twice. On the first run, the wall was just fabric, which did not tear away in a manner that was visually striking. They went back three weeks later and built a styrofoam wall knowing that the Tesla would fail, and pre-cut the wall to create a more interesting impact.

        • Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          Particularly disappointing part of that interview was Rober saying he still plans to buy a new Tesla. Safety issues aside, why would anyone want to do that?

          • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Knowing the insanity of die-hard Tesla fans, it’s likely to try and protect himself.

            “I love my Tesla, but” has been a meme for years now because if you ever went on forums to get help or complain what a giant heap of shit the car was, and didn’t bookend it with unabashed praise, you’d have people ripping you to shreds calling you a FUDster and Big Oil shill who’s shorting the stock and trying to destroy the greatest company the world has ever known.

            People have learned over the years that even with the most valid of criticism for the company, the only way to even attempt to have it received is by showing just how much you actually love Tesla and Daddy Elon, and your complaints/criticism are only because you care so much about the company and want them to do better. Yes, it’s fucking stupid and annoying, but sadly this is the reality we’ve created for ourselves.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Because the car actually does stop for things that aren’t fake walls made to look like a road, and at least for people as tested by testing agencies

            This is the euro NCAP testing.

            https://youtu.be/4Hsb-0v95R4

            Note: not all of these cars have lidar, but some do.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Hopefully with a Mythbusters-style remote control setup in case it explodes. And the trunk filled with ANFO to make sure it does.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, because he knew that thing probably wasn’t gonna stop. Why destroy the car when you don’t have to? Concrete wouldn’t have changed the outcome.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      me waving a little handheld flag on a tiny pole that just says “Brand loyalty”

      …what? No medal???