You’re only able to choose two options, how is that democracy? I thought democracy was about being able to choose anyone you think is suitable to be a leader, not one of two pre-selected people. At that point, it’s not much different to a one-party system, just with two people rather than only one person.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think rank choice will result in third party but it will take some time. Our republic system does make it slower though compared to parliamentary systems.

    • vvilld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I appreciate your optimism, but I do not share it and have seen no evidence to support it.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean maine is the only state with possibly enough time to possibly have any effect. Remember that the senate only turns over every 6 years for a position. They have two senators and two reps and one is independent, but that was the case before. What we see there is incumbents continuing to win but given their reps I don’t see this as surprising. It will make a bigger difference when its more contested. If it came to illinois it would give duckworth difficulties because of her military and security voting. Honestly given our executive ignoring the courts im not sure if its going to matter much unless we get back to a somewhat working system in general.

        • vvilld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Completely agree on that last point. I don’t really expect we’ll see completely fair and open elections in this country for a while, if ever again.