And it still discriminates against all legitimate uses. Because you can never be sure if the police still decides to break up the protest after such a chant. And when the police breaks up the protest (with the possibility of violence) after the parole has been used and then it turns out that a judge later decides that it wasn’t illegal, it’s probably less of a consolidation after the fact.
Why would they? They areein line with the “Staatsräson”. Friedrich Merz even wanted to invite one of them, even though he’s got an international arrest warrant.
Its allegedly is a Hamas slogan.
And it still discriminates against all legitimate uses. Because you can never be sure if the police still decides to break up the protest after such a chant. And when the police breaks up the protest (with the possibility of violence) after the parole has been used and then it turns out that a judge later decides that it wasn’t illegal, it’s probably less of a consolidation after the fact.
It was not invented by Hamas, but they’ve used it.
And?
So have Israeli ultra-nationalists (not with the “Palestine” bit, but… yeah)
I know and I find that one much worse than the Palestine version.
AfaIk, Israeli ultra nationalists, unfortunately, are not considered terror organizations in Germany.
Why would they? They areein line with the “Staatsräson”. Friedrich Merz even wanted to invite one of them, even though he’s got an international arrest warrant.
Do you understand the meaning of “unfortunately”? Does it suggest, I’m okay with that?
I wasn’t talking about whether or not you’re OK with that, but rather that it fits with German policy.