• Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wouldn’t the production bottlenecks be non-3D printable components like the PCBs for the Flight Controller and the Electronic Speed Control Stack? Those aren’t things you can just whip together in a garage.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I could imagine these can be ordered from abroad. There are many pcb manufacturers but not many for specific drone parts.

      I would imagine that for some models scaling using an injection mold would be worthwhile. So you can keep prototyping and adjusting and in parallel scale up and make the small fpv’s even cheaper.

      • lemmyman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Injection molding is capital intensive and generally geographically concentrated (i.e. factories). It makes for easy and expensive targets.

        3d printing can be distributed, and capable printers are amazingly cheap.

        There’s way more to it, just pointing out one “pro” for 3dp

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Absolutely, no doubt about it.

          Although some industry in Ukraine might nog have better things to do and the speed at which stuff can be made increases “a bit”… I’m not thinking everything… just some parts.

          The agility of 3d printing is magnificent. It allows small adjustments to be made and distributed for rapid iteration of improvement. Even local experimentation of modifications and custom part printing.

          On top of this 3d printers can print anything, not just drone parts… so it might help on other fronts too.