Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this…)

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In the late 2000s, rationalists were squarely in the middle of transhumanism. They were into the Singularity, but also the cryonics and a whole pile of stuff they got from the Extropians. It was very much the thing.

    These days they’re most interested in Effective Altruism (loudly -the label at least) and race science (used to be quiet, now a bit louder). I hardly ever hear them even mention transhumanism as it was back then.

    Did rationalists abandon transhumanism?

    Is it just me? What happened?

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        still holds - it’s still a bunch that needs a label and that’s the label

        even as TREACLES was right there

        (i asked emile, they said it was TESCREAL is very searchable. i mean fine)

    • bitofhope@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      One of the most popular and controversial ways in recent times to use technological means to improve human condition and overcome its natural limitations is gender affirming care, such as hormone replacement therapy. Transhumanism is woke now — hell, “trans” is right there in the name!

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Another thread worth pulling is that biotechnology and synthetic biology have turned out to be substantially harder to master than anticipated, and it didn’t seem like it was ever the primary area of expertise for a lot of these people anyway. I don’t have a copy of any of Kurzweil’s books at hand to look at his predicted timelines for that stuff, but they’re surely way off.

      Faulty assumptions about the biological equivalence of digital neural network algorithms have done a lot of unexamined heavy lifting in driving the current AI bubble, and keeping the harder stuff on the fringes of the conversation. That said, I don’t doubt that a few refugees from the bubble-burst will attempt to inflate the next bubble on the back of speculative biotech, and I’ve seen a couple of signs of that already.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Yes, there was a big hype in the upcoming biotech revolution in popular transhumanist media a ~decade ago. Lot of it seems to have fizzled out or gone nootropics like stuff. (And even that is meh).

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s possible that the most popular fora for discussions of the other topics were drowned out by AI doomerism and the people who are interested in them simply left.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      As to cryonics… for both LLM doomers and accelerationists, they have no need for a frozen purgatory when the techno-rapture is just a few years around the corner.

      As for the rest of the shiny futuristic dreams, they have give way to ugly practical realities:

      • no magic nootropics, just Scott telling people to take adderal and other rationalists telling people to micro dose on LSD

      • no low hanging fruit in terms of gene editing (as epistaxis pointed out over on reddit) so they’re left with eugenics and GeneSmith’s insanity

      • no drexler nanotech so they are left hoping (or fearing) the god-AI can figure it (which is also a problem for ever reviving cryonically frozen people)

      • no exocortex, just over priced google glasses and a hallucinating LLM “assistant”

      • no neural jacks (or neural lace or whatever the cyberpunk term for them is), just Elon murdering a bunch of lab animals and trying out (temporary) hope on paralyzed people

      The future is here, and it’s subpar compared to the early 2000s fantasies. But hey, you can rip off Ghibli’s style for your shitty fanfic projects, so there are a few upsides.