• MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Everytime I hear arguments against wealth tax, gift tax, property tax or inheritance tax. It’s the same argument, it’s unfair towards the people who has worked all their life and want to leave their already taxed money to their family.

    In Norway we have no inheritance tax and no tax on gifts. Most people have no taxes on homes either. We do have some wealth tax.

    My main issue with the arguments against it is that its is lacking imagination. We make the rules, we can decide to make it fair. We can set a limit for when taxation occurs at a really high number. Just so that 98% of Norwegians get zero taxes on these things.

    Zero taxes for inheritance up to 1 000 000 euros and then 75% on every euro above. Is possible.

    Zero taxes on gifts up to 50 000 euros a year is possible.

    No taxes on homes worth less than 1 000 000 is possible.

    Bringing wealth with you when you permanently move out of the country is possible for values less than 5 000 000 euros for instance.

    Then adjust for inflation every year (like we do with many of our welfare systems)

    If we do this we can get rid of the wealth tax that the rich hate so much (because they are disadvantaged owners compared to owners of businesses in other countries)

    No regular people will feel these taxes at all, and they make sure that the wealth is distributed over time. It’s still possible to get rich, and remain rich. But your children can be rich but not insanely rich.

    Exactly what the rates should be is up for debate, but this system is in my opinion a better one.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just mandate a luxury tax on all things normal people don’t buy. You can have wealth, but you cannot have anything normal people cannot have without paying. Oh you want to acquire a whole ass business? You want to donate millions for political influence? You want a Ferrari? Want more land or a huge house? You pay demoralizing amounts of luxury tax.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      You can take this a step further and ask why we have this aggregation of wealth at all. Private wealth consolidation is a form of malinvestment resulting from a handful of individuals who are told they can effectively loot the economy unchecked.

      Taxation “solves” the problem by clawing back some of that malinvestment. But if you recognize it as malinvestment from the outset, you can see arguments against having these private aggregators of wealth at all.

      Instead of taxes, why not simply impose a maximum income? In baseball, you’d call it a salary cap.

      • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Of course, but we are as a society so far away from that. It requires a bigger cultural shift than we are anywhere near. Even the thought of an inheritance tax is very unpopular.

        Yes, even as a very social democratic country with a highly educated populace, we can be pretty stupid about taxes.

        Also most really rich people have their wealth in assets and make their money as gains on those assets. So it does not really tax the most important people, except maybe some C-suites.

      • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        if there was a maximum income people would still bitch and whine about those with mansions aquired through non monetary means.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      In the U.S. gift tax is exempt on the first $14 million you give. You just have to submit a tax form when you file your taxes. So someone can gift each of their 5 grandchildren a million dollar house, and then give them $1.8 million dollars in cash each before they die. And avoid any gift tax on any of that. Then get taxed an inheritance tax. There is no Federal inheritance tax. Which if you live in a state like Tennessee where I live, the inheritance tax is 0%. So you have now avoided paying any taxes passing down any amount of wealth you potentially have. If you are a billionaire and have an accountant that can’t figure out how to bypass paying taxes you or they must be willfully choosing to do so in the U.S.

      • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is in Norwegian, but most services is based on this number https://www.nav.no/grunnbelopet

        Which currently is 124 028 NOK which is roughly 10 350 euros.

        This number is referenced as G (Grunnbeløpet)

        So for instance if I lose my job I can get up to 62.4% of a salary up to 6G. Which is the maximum.

        Meaning the maximum payout is 744 168 (6G) * 0.624 = 464 360 NOK.

        We have tons of calculations like this for all sorts of welfare services.

        Every year in may this number is adjusted.