Bonus issue:

This one is a little bit less obvious

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      15 days ago

      Oh, I can help! 🎉

      1. computers like lists, they organize things.
      2. itemized things are better when linked! 🔗
      3. I hate myself a little for writing this out 😐
    • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      My conspricy theory is that early LLMs have a hard time figuring out the logical relation between sentenses, hence do not generate good transitions between sentences.

      I think bullet point might be manually tuned up by the developers, but not inheritly present in the model; because we don’t tend to see bullet points that much in normal human communications.

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Late but I’m pretty sure it’s a byproduct of the RHLF process used to train these types of models. Basically, they have a bunch of humans look at multiple outputs from the LLM and rate the best ones, and it turns out people find lists easier to understand than other styles (alternatively, the poor souls slaving away in the AI mines rating responses all day find it faster to understand a list than a paragraph through the blurry lens of mental fatigue)