• squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No it isn’t. That is corporatocracy. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Let me get this right.

          You don’t think the British East Indian Company’s conquest of India was imperialism either?

          Because it wasn’t technically the state doing it.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              You know what, I deserve this conversation. I’ve trolled people with “It can’t be imperialism because we’re a republic” before, this is just karma.

              On the off chance that you’re not just trolling, no, it isn’t, because your definition sucks and is deliberately limited so you can be a pedantic yet incorrect twat about some of history’s greatest crimes.

              • squirmy_wormy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                No I’m not being a troll. And it’s not my definition, it’s the actual meaning of the word. Words - especially when used in emotionally charged contexts - have meaning and when they are misused to make a nice little sound bite, it dilutes the power they have. I don’t like when people do that.