• Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    And vice versa. Tree roots need to be exposed to air and paving over them is bad for the tree.

    Properly introducing trees in urban environments would take rethinking how we build roads and sidewalks. This thing looks like you could deploy it anywhere.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Trees are good for our sanity. The healing tank from Starship Troopers might be good for the environment depending on how it’s powered etc but it is certainly dystopian to look at

    • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      So why don’t we rethink the way we design urban environments to be more friendly to all life rather than the car-centric urban hellscapes we have now?

      • entwine413@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Because it would take trillions of dollars to do that at scale.

        Not saying it’s a good justification, it’s just the answer to why.

        • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Slowly, over time making our cities better for future generations to live in?

          It doesn’t have to be calculated in dollars but in quality of life. It’s investing in the welfare of your people. Plus, every city that has heavily pedestrianised so far has seen an increase in local spending and a decrease in public infrastructure spending.

          So like… Even the money people should know.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 hours ago

            What wretched scumbags downvoted this? Even Star Trek had fucking trees Jesus Christ

            • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Beats me. People seem to just want bandaid solutions that “scientists” think up that will cost trillions of dollars rather than solutions like… Planting trees and flowers in neighbourhoods that benefit humans and nature.

              I wonder how long one of these algae tanks would have to run to counter the emissions cost of creating, placing and maintaining said algae tank. This shit is literally techbros reinventing the train every other month.

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The people with the money only see things one quarter at a time. It’s a shame, but that’s the way the world is now.