• FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems like maybe you don’t. Please explain to me how what I said is wrong? If their position is that trans people don’t exist, how can they ban them from the military?

          • Ava@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not saying “gender dysphoria is not a diagnosis that exists anywhere” it’s saying “believing yourself to be transgender is a substantial enough mental illness and flaw in character so as to preclude military service.”

            This claims that having gender dysphoria is some sort of deficiency, and not just a non-standard identifier. This invalidates the identity of trans people, and calls into question their legitimacy.

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              OK so you can’t show how this “denies that trans people exist”. We got there in the end.

                • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You haven’t, and you can’t, because if it was denying trans people exist then the entire EO wouldn’t make any sense because it would be prohibiting people that don’t exist from serving in the military.