• answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    She and her husband The Clinton foundation recieved hundrends of millions from those same gulf countrues much more than $400m counting inflation

  • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    ooo! a real zinger from an irrelevant loser? now THAT will solve some problems.

    so sick of these stupid ‘dunks’ and social media circle jerks.

  • Michael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton’s camp insisted that Trump and other extremists should be “elevated” to “leaders of the pack” and media outlets should be told to “take them seriously.”

    She may not be playing now, but I feel it’s fair to point out that Hillary has played some stupid games - the American people reap the stupid prize.

    • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.”

      It’s important to note that this also applied to Democratic candidates. With the Republicans moving 100 miles to the Right, Democrats didn’t think anyone would notice them moving 20 miles to the Right. Clinton and the DNC are just as responsible for the Overton window shift as the Republicans are. If not more so. Had they embraced and supported people like Sanders, who would have absolutely demolished Trump, we wouldn’t be in this fucking mess.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hillary was targeted by at least as much politically motivated investigations into her affairs as Trump got, and they all ended up going nowhere, whereas Trump got convicted of 37 felonies. But that doesn’t seem to stop MAGAts rushing to post “crooked Hillary” and make suspiciously vaguely worded accusations every time the opportunity arises.

    Notice how they never actually go into detail, because doing so would then require them to show evidence, so it’s only ever “she was bought by the corporations” and “she knows all about corruption”.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That is a $400 million money pit, not a jet

    They’re searching for an idiot to accept and pay for its maintenance fees

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Out of everybody out there, Hillary “I got a half a million dollars from Goldman Sachs for spending a few hours giving a speech to some traders” Clinton is maybe not the best person to talk about this.

    Then again, she does have the benefit of hands on experience on this.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I read it in, if I’m not mistaken The Guardian, way back when she was starting her campaign for President.

        Others are quoting a broader pattern of receiving money for speeches from her, so those are probably more well informed than my vague recollection.

  • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’d leave Hillary alone. She’s a relic from a different era. Not really relevant these days.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    She and Bill would definitely know this but then also lacking the self awareness to call it out, that is the surprising part.

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hillary was targeted by at least as much politically motivated investigations into her affairs as Trump got, and they all ended up going nowhere, whereas Trump got convicted of 37 felonies. But that doesn’t seem to stop MAGAts rushing to post “crooked Hillary” and make suspiciously vaguely worded accusations every time the opportunity arises.

      Notice how they never actually go into detail, because doing so would then require them to show evidence, so it’s only ever “she was bought by the corporations” and “she knows all about corruption”.

      • lmfamao@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        How about this for evidence? Taken from M1ch431 elsewhere in this thread

        The original source is a verified, leaked email (dated April 23, 2015) from her 2016 campaign. The DNC plan was attached in the email and can be found here. The specific quote is from Salon.

      • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Say what you want, her coronation as D candidate in 2015 over a much more popular Bernie Sanders led to a weak turnout by disenchanted D voters and Trump’s victory in 2016.

        Whether she is a murderer/ felon or not, she can take her opinion and shove it

  • Mouette@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hillary is just jealous she has to hide and do it slowly for years whereas Trump doesn’t give a single fuck and do it the obnoxious way for 2 times more money.

    • dickalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hillary was targeted by at least as much politically motivated investigations into her affairs as Trump got, and they all ended up going nowhere, whereas Trump got convicted of 37 felonies. But that doesn’t seem to stop MAGAts rushing to post “crooked Hillary” and make suspiciously vaguely worded accusations every time the opportunity arises.

      Notice how they never actually go into detail, because doing so would then require them to show evidence, so it’s only ever “she was bought by the corporations” and “she knows all about corruption”.