• Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Truenas scale to host:

    Jellyfin (alternative to movie/tv streaming services)

    Navidrome (alternative to Apple Music/spotify)

    Obsidian

    The “-arr” services

    Tailscale (to access these services outside of my house)

  • Blass Rose@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I love the two sides of “It’s about the price of a cup of coffee” like they’re not referring to a 30oz premium milkshake with a shot of espresso, not a regular black coffee.

    Then the

    “Your generation can’t afford anything because of your coffee addiction!”

    Like companies aren’t just monetizing every single last thing and telling us “you’ll own nothing and you’ll LIKE IT!”

    • onion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also the price of a coffee has gone up considerably in the last couple years

  • MrSilkworm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As everyone else here, I think piracy is illegal and immoral. We should accept that we don’t own our services and software and we should never doubt that corporations have our best interest in mind.

    Therefore you should never have a Plex server, never use protonmail, never use AdGuard Home, never use AdGuard DNS for private DNS.

    Also you should never use Firefox with UBlock origin sponsorblock and consent o magic.

    Lastly you should never ever use re-vanced and x-manager, and God forbid don’t use a VPN

    Edit: syntax

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        My very hyperbolic point was that most of us don’t subscribe to just one service. Pretty easy to subscribe to multiple of these and others like cloud backup services, car navigation, and other media like maybe even a news service. That’s a lot of subscriptions, and companies are trying to find even more ways to make us pay subscriptions. Everything from having to pay subscriptions to have parts of your car work to computer games. My point was a sarcastic take on how much we are being forced to subscribe to if we want to participate in what constitutes “normal” things these days.

        Edit: appropriately just dropped into my feed: https://lemmy.world/post/11140824 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/13005167

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I hate people defending subscriptions. They are not required for anything other than insurance or something you guaranteed will keep, like phone contracts. If they need more money for content, release content packs and dlc. Online should not cost, especially if someone like Nintendo is using peer2peer or will shut down the online servers anyways at some point.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I get that services need to pay for staff/servers/production, so I’m fine with small monthly fees. I’d much rather pay than sit through ads.

    Once a subscription creeps over six or seven bucks a month I’m gonna reevaluate it and start cutting.

    It really annoys me that newspapers charge the same for digital and paper subscriptions.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The only sub I use is Spotify. I share it across my friends and family and like their vast catalog. They also don’t charge for their API so I can integrate it with Home Assistant.

    My friends and family agree downloading songs manually sucks.

    Piracy is a service issue. I have no problems with subscriptions as long as the price and service outpace piracy.

    If the price gets to a point it doesn’t make sense, I go back to piracy.

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You guys are complaining about a subscription to apple and amazon ? go look how much a subscription to an Autodesk product costs ?

    • Hillock@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They aren’t comparable. Autodesk is a business product, not for consumers. The product makes you money and the price for it is a business expense and tax deductible. While subscriptions to Spotify, Netflix, etc. aren’t.

      • cerulean_blue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No, it’s more comparable. AutoDesk, same as Photoshop. You used to be able to purchase it outright (at great expense, sure). Now that’s not even an option, you have to subscribe monthly.

        There was never a non-subscription version of Spotify.

  • finestnothing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The only subscriptions I am willing to pay for:

    Phone bill - no choice
    Internet bill - no choice
    Insurance - no choice
    World of Warcraft - sue me
    Costco membership - worth it
    VPN - worth it

    I don’t pay for any others. Paid for lifetime Plex for the convenience of not needing to pay for a website domain like I would for jellyfin, and self host my own music, tv, and movies

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      3 of those are services. Most subscription shit we see these days are products that they want us to treat like services even though there is no on going consumption. All of these software subscription services are just grifts.

  • IHateFacelessPorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Netflix and Spotify actually makes sense to be subscription based. Amazon depends on how often you do shopping through them since it’s actually free (if you don’t include the fees) to function. I definitely wouldn’t pay for Dropbox but cloud storage and sync pretty much has to be a monthly subscription. If you are going to be against something at least be against to the parts that makes sense to be against of.

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Life worked perfectly fine before Netflix and Spotify, everything was also fine before cloud everything.

      They can suck on my left nut.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Spotify makes sense to have based on pure convenience. NSO is alright, but if you already emulate, there’s not much point in NSO due to Switch online multiplayer being ass. Paying for Adobe is amateur hour. Dropbox? Don’t make me laugh. Twitter blue is just sad.

        • onion@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Exactly. One album a month and BAM you own 120 albums after a decade, and a huge collection when you’re old

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        if you want to support your favorite artist go to their concert, buy their album/merch.

        I personally don’t care about any of that, personally I just want convenient music in one place, if there wasn’t spotify, there would just be some pirated service where artists would earn nothing. or Radio where there is no exposure for lesser artists.

        so really I am not sure what kind of better solution you could come up with.