• Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The part of the article we would be most concerned with would probably be:

        (d) medical facilities, medical equipment, medical supplies or medical transportation;

        This, in my understanding is generally considered to be actual hospitals and field hospitals;

        Transport: ambulance, Helicopters and planes;

        Medical equipment: critical equipment and tools;

        Medical supplies: Supply drops or small deliveries en route to a military unit.

        Ultimately, I’m not a lawyer, I just teach some material. If there was an argument as to whether or not it breaches the protocol that would be up to an international criminal court, maybe UN scrutiny? I start to lose the ball around here.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Thank you for the insight, I’m still unsure if this is a war crime but it likely warrants scrutiny from the relevant authorities.

          I think people often chuck the declaration of war crime around a bit too quickly and without a proper understanding.

          • Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I’m glad I could be of a little help. Nations have been trying to clearly define these things for centuries.

            I think your final statement is why I’m here. A lot of internet discourse around war immediately resorts to calling everything a war crime. That’s an incredibly precise label and we can’t always be certain. What I know for sure is that war is hell and undue suffering is wrong.