InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 days agoMatty being Matty.hexbear.netimagemessage-square58linkfedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down10
arrow-up1128arrow-down1imageMatty being Matty.hexbear.netInevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net to Slop.@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square58linkfedilink
minus-squareSoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·3 days agoI too think the designated “progressive” party in a two-party system should resign to a purely reactive position and leave it to the right to actually try to change people’s beliefs.
minus-squareClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoA reactive position based on what’s popular with voters would be a significant improvement over current Dem strategy
I too think the designated “progressive” party in a two-party system should resign to a purely reactive position and leave it to the right to actually try to change people’s beliefs.
A reactive position based on what’s popular with voters would be a significant improvement over current Dem strategy