This was based on a question that my economics professor in college had asked us. His question was more to the effect of “What’s a good/service people buy when they have a bit of money, then they stop buying or buy less of it when they get some more money, and then they start buying it again once they have even more money?” — feel free to answer that too.
My first thought was alcohol: lower class people might buy more of it to cope with their difficult situation, whereas upper class people have more money to spend on vices and luxuries such as alcohol. Not sure if this theory holds true.
The best answer I’ve been able to come up with is golf carts, at least in the US. It’s common to see lower class people drive golf carts around their trailer parks or neighborhoods, whereas middle class people rarely do that. An upper class person might live in a wealthy neighborhood with its own built-in golf course, or the person might even own their own golf course(s).
Some dubious investments, such as crypto or donations to certain social organizations or politicians might also qualify?
This is less of a specific good and more of a trend, but middle class people are more likely to buy bulk goods. Lower classes often don’t have the means to do so (space to store it and money to buy it, or access to places that sell in bulk) and higher classes simply don’t need to, or they buy luxury items that wouldn’t be sold in bulk.
Similarly, middle class people are less likely to shop at places with high markups, such as convenience stores.
The times when people shop would also see trends, with lower and higher classes doing more shopping midday on a Tuesday and middle class working people with average 9-5 office jobs being unable to do so.
Any farm animal
This made me laugh, it’s so true! Apart from chickens though - I know a few middle class people with chickens.
Maybe car leases?
- lower income can’t afford to purchase and a lease is a lower payment
- wealthy either want to replace cars more often or use a car leases by a business
If middle income fall into that trap, it’s probably on the way to lower income?
Horse. You well off, Dad’s got a bit of land? Then you can have a horse. Nine of yous, living in a caravan with your Mum? Then you can have a horse. Grow up in a semi-detached? No horse for you!
It’s common to see lower class people drive golf carts around their trailer parks or neighborhoods
I thought this was regional. I’ve seen it in Florida but not where I live, not that I’ve ever been to a trailer park
I live in a decidedly middle class area and people driving golf carts around is super common. Some communities even have their own golf cart paths to the local grocery stores, and those stores have dedicated gold cart parking.
It’s very common at least in the US south east.
I think golf carts are more a regional thing where the weather is good enough most the year and there are destinations in reasonable range. Driving 5 miles to Costco in freezing weather isn’t really a golf cart activity.
Old cars.
Good one!
I routinely use terms like “classic” to describe my cars. It amuses me, and is mostly harmless.
But, on occasion, this has disappointed a friend who I gave a ride to, who did not realize the term was meant as humor.
(Though technically correct, I guess? My car is old, if not nice.)
Gambling
Transportation services
RVs
Recreational drugs
Horses and related services
This is fun, but I’ll end this with the obligatory: There are two main classes, the ownership class and the working class. The lower and middle classes are subsets of the working class.
Old cars
I like that one. I used to jokingly tell people I drove a classic car. It was technically correct, but no one was impressed by my rusted out, 1980s, economy sedan or its 115 horses.
Here I am wondering how old i can get away with and still be safe and reliable for my teens to drive
Lmfao
Gambling
[Poor People] Delusion of winning big VS [Rich People] Just enjoying spending their time throwing money away because they have endless supply of money
Transportation services
[Poor People] Having to ride a Bus because you can’t afford a car VS [Rich People] Personal Driver driving you everywhete
Why does this come off as insufferable? Is it a tone over text thing? Is it me?
Oh I guess because a text-only forum loses the real life expressions.
Its more like: “Bruh 💀” - Like it’s funny, but in a fucked up dystopian context, ya know what I mean?
Recreational drugs are purchased by pretty much everyone
Good point. I should have said, “illicit drugs.”
Those too.
I don’t have any data to support it, but I’d speculate that the middle class uses a lot less illicit drugs, lacking the desperation of the poor or the protections of the wealthy.
I also speculate that your idea of illicit drugs is not correct.
Maybe but I wonder that too. Now that Marijuana is legit most places, that’s a vice for the middle class. They can’t risk illegal when there’s a legal option and can’t afford some of the workarounds that wealthy can
Large amounts of debt.
Financial services as a percent of income, yes. That’s a good one. Being poor is relatively expensive.
College. The middle class is too rich for aid but too poor to pay
Bicycles! Lower class uses them as transportation, upper class uses them for recreation.
I feel like recreational biking or mountain biking is a very middle class thing to do tbh.
Man…I must really be upper class then.
When will my salary catch up to that?You and I have different definitions of upper class.
Upper class have pelatons
We are part of the dwindling middle class & I ride an electric bike to work. So much cheaper than a car but so expensive for a bike, it seems a middle class thing. Though maybe living close to work is in itself an upper class thing?
Our city does a semiannual ebike voucher raffle thing with a large number of large vouchers (would cover the cost) for verified low income, plus a smaller number of smaller vouchers (still would be a big discount) for non income verified.
Lawyers
There are lots of middle class divorce lawyers
Legal services, fines, etc. I wish I had thought of that.
Cocaine
Eh, that’s really for everyone.
I’d change that to “illegal drugs” as lower class can’t usually afford cocaine that’s not cut with fentanyl, but instead buy weed, shrooms, acid, meth, and other cheap drugs. Rich people, in addition to cocaine also have access to more of the designer drugs like MDMA, not to mention prescription drugs with a high street value that poor folks can’t afford unless they’re addicted to something like painkillers, but then they’ll usually have to go the cheaper route of fentanyl
Crack cocaine use is pervasive among the lowest income folks in my area, as are meth and K2. And those people sure as hell aren’t doing mushrooms or acid. My point is that cocaine use definitely has a bimodal distribution
Just wondering, why do you think that coke users stay away from psychadelics and vice versa?
I think crack users don’t bother with hallucinogens because they’re looking for high impact dopamine hits, not a lengthy psychedelic experience. I don’t think vice versa is true, people who use psychedelics aren’t necessarily avoiding cocaine, but they’re probably using higher quality cocaine rather than crack
Meth makes sense, it’s cheap as fuck to produce. Cocaine? I thought that was so expensive nobody could support a habit unless you had essentially unlimited money.
Crack cocaine has always been a poor man’s drug. It’s highly adulterated and thus much cheaper
It’s more that clean is hard to find / expensive, and that you can fairly safely build up a tolerance and then burn/snort through a fuckton.
I’m pretty sure all you really need is a plant and some gasoline for distilling or whatever it’s called.
Chlorine for water treatment. Cheap and useful where clean water is difficult to come by and where water is stored for long term use. Also very common to buy if you have a pool. But maybe for middle class households it is not as common of an item - except perhaps in areas were pools are common enough in middle-class homes.
Just a guess!
Rental properties.
The lower class tends not to own much property, especially not extra houses they can rent out or whatever.
Could we reframe it as rental services? The wealthy pay them to manage the property they own, and the poor poor pay them for the right to live there.
But renting is not buying, and OP was talking about buying.
That’s a good point. I’d still argue that renting is buying a service, but I agree there may be some ambiguity here.
