• frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Honestly, I kind of don’t even care. If that’s what it takes to get people to realize that it’s a serious problem, cool. I mean, it’s aggravating, but at least now something might actually happen that helps protect people who aren’t megastars.

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Blah blah blah so tiring to hear this thoughtless perspective constantly pushed in the fediverse.

        • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m just saying, nothing about this should lead anyone to the conclusion that anyone in power is suddenly going to start caring about poor people. They’re literally only talking about this because a billionaire got its feelings hurt.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you don’t like discourse that is different from your beliefs then plug your ears and shout lalala as you have been doing so for decades.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Someone complaining about the same thoughtless perspective is not complaining about discourse.

            Just once I’d love to have actual discourse about capitalism. I’ve never met a person who expressed hatred of capitalism who seemed capable of of discourse unfortunately.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The only thing that could possibly happen to protect people from this is to make AI illegal. That would be (a) impossible to enforce without draconian decrease in individual freedom, like keeping people stuffed in crates of packing foam instead of free to move around, and (b) absolutely horrible if it were successfully enforced.

      AI is cheaper and easier to proliferate than any drug. We have not succeeded in controlling drugs, despite their physical requirements of mass and volume making them visible in reality, a feature AI does not share.

      The attempt to control AI can and will destroy all our freedoms if we let it. Again, the only way to control something so ephemeral as computation is to massively restrict all freedom.