• Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 days ago

    The far better question is why they need assault rifles?

    A suppressor is actually a good thing to put on any weapon. That’s why they’re becoming standard in the military. Guns are unbelievably loud, to the point that they can cause serious and permanent hearing damage to people around you when you fire them. If you’re accepting the premise that an armed police force is a good thing (I disagree, but that’s a separate discussion) it at least makes sense to minimize collateral damage. The sound of gunfire is especially dangerous indoors; if an officer was forced to fire their weapon in an environment like they could actually seriously injure innocent bystanders just from the noise alone.

    On the other hand, collateral damage is exactly why a 5.56mm carbine makes no sense as a police weapon. Those rounds will go straight through a human body, straight through a brick wall, and still be lethal. You could end up killing someone you can’t even see. It used to be that when law enforcement wanted extra firepower, they used submachine guns and shotguns, weapons with very little potential for overpenetration. But then police forces all started freaking out about the idea that every criminal was going to be wearing level 3 body armour and demanding to use the same guns soldiers use (not helped by the fact that cops in the US are allowed to buy surplus military equipment at knockdown prices).

    This doesn’t come from an operational need, it comes from the fact that every cop wants to cosplay at being military, but without all the hardships that actually come with that. That’s why you see federal agents and SWAT all running around in multicam and other military camo patterns, despite the fact that those patterns really don’t do much of anything in an urban environment. It’s all just dress up to make their peepees feel bigger.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well said. If you’ve ever been next to someone at an indoor range firing large caliber rounds without a suppressor, it’s very unpleasant to be near them if you’re plinking 9mm or 22lr.

      I support taking supressors off the NFA (and also abolishing the NFA altogether, but that’s another argument). Calling them silencers is incorrect. They’re safety devices. Some states don’t even classify them as firearms. Any supersonic round is still loud enough to require ear protection.

      • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        YES. That is the most annoying shit ever. I’m just tryna have a good time practicing good technique with a handgun and I have to sit and listen to some moron spray hundreds of dollars worth of ammo away so they can feel like they’re the coolest dude at the range. Then they leave and we all look around at each other like “thank fuck that asshole is finally gone eye roll emoji

    • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Those rounds will go straight through a human body, straight through a brick wall, and still be lethal.

      This is incorrect. The 5.56 / .223 cartridge is not like in the movies. The nose of the bullet deforms on impact by design.

      There are precious few cartridges that will “go through a brick wall”. There are even fewer that would be lethal on the other side of that wall.

      My thought is that these rifles have no business being leveraged for this application.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago
        1. There are different kinds of 5.56mm ammo, they don’t all have the same construction or behave the same way. We don’t know what ICE are loading.
        2. Even M855 green tip (which is what it sounds like you’re describing, or at least some similar variety of FMJ soft core round) can pierce lighter body armour and still be lethal. That means against an unarmoured target it’s going to have very little problem going in and out of a human body.
        3. While I’ll grant that most softer varieties of 5.56 will be stopped by brick (again, we don’t know exactly what ICE are loading, but fairs fair, it was somewhat of an overstatement on my part), they will certainly have no difficulty going through drywall, wood, and other visual obstructions that could be concealing an innocent bystander. While it’s certainly true that something like a 9mm can also penetrate many of these obstructions, it will not retain nearly as much lethality when doing so, and it simply makes no sense to increase your risk of injuring a bystander every time you fire for basically no gain. If you fire an AR-15 inside a building (which, y’know, is where a bunch of people doing no-knock raids expect to be spending a lot of their time) you have a very high chance of killing an innocent bystander you couldn’t even see.

        For more on this I consulted my wife who confirmed that she’s been shown videos in training of 5.56 going through multiple layers of dry-wall and still retaining lethal velocity. You can see this in this video here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3BlRPtCj2E) but know that this is also what professionals are taught about their weapons when considering targets, over-penetration and cover.

        • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Drywall and wood are wildly different than brick walls in stopping power, and I would absolutely agree that most bullets (even the lead-nosed [or soft] bullets) will go through several layers of gypsum and at least one layer of wood and retain lethality.

          One correction: Green tips are different than you describe. They can penetrate low level body armor because of the steel core. They are not soft core. They penetrate low level body armor because the softer lead and copper jacket deform / slough off, and then the steel core continues to move through.

          The M855 round was designed to penetrate through vehicles (doors and windows) and still be lethal to unarmored occupants. They just happen to be relatively effective at piercing low level armor as well.

          Edit: To go back to my original thought: I still do not believe that these rifles should be leveraged by the police.

  • selfdefense420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    why do we all need to continue this giant circle jerk? is there a single person here who doesn’t understand that republicans are evil, that cops are fascists, that capitalism is killing us, that our president is a fucking moron, that corporations are run by sociopaths, and that religion is the scaffolding that holds it all together?

    i mean seriously. i’m confused. do you guys just enjoy joking about it all? do you need the dopamine high of dunking to the choir? why don’t we talk about solutions instead of rehashing the same old bullshit day after day?

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      do you guys just enjoy joking about it all?

      Yes.

      Morale matters.

      Humor is a weapon.

      Preaching to the choir is an important part of a pastor’s job - because who wants to hear the Word more than true believers do?

      Online circlejerks are powerful community building tools - they reaffirm true believers’ loyalty, strengthen the commitment of moderates, and expose visiting lurkers to the movement’s perspective and the passion of its members.

      Let’s not forget how racist circlejerks on FB and Reddit and the chans memed Trump into office in 2016.

      Jerking about problems can’t be all a movement does, of course - but an online movement that doesn’t share memes, and in-jokes, and news that supports it, and similar kinds of community building, is dead on the ground.

      • SSNs4evr@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It helps morale, and makes stress easier to deal with, and can build solidarity. Several years ago, in a situation where me and 131 other people were waiting for our imminent deaths, and were powerless to do anything about it, some people were freaking out, some sat in silence, and others of us joked and laughed about the situation. I actually asked one of my friends if he’d like to retake an exam, so he could maybe pass it, and sue with a better grade. He really bombed an exam badly, the day before, and there obviously wouldn’t be time for other remediation. He he told me to fuck off, we both laughed, did a “cheers” with our half empty coffees, and finished them off.

        I was one of the laughers/jokers, but when the situation changed, giving us hope of survival, the laughing and joking went silent. Hope brought the stress for the rest of us. Obviously, we survived (I’m thumbing this missive out on my phone). I’ve been married over 20 years, have a couple kids.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      God damn if you didn’t sum up lemmy in two fucking paragraphs.

      All those issues are real, and I have no idea what the best solution is.

      Being on here WILL get you depressed… But knowing this info is also important… I don’t know man…

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s not that they need silencers, but that ICE needs to hire from the pool of people obsessed with guns to be able to continue acting as the US gestapo it is.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    The reason for having suppressors is to make it less loud when you shoot your weapon at an immigrant or protestor

  • PoPoP@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Every rifle used by law enforcement ought to have a silencer. If they’re gonna murder someone the absolute rock bottom very least they can do is not cause severe permanent hearing damage to a hundred other people in the vicinity.

    It’s not like it’s a stealth thing. It’s not going to do anything to prevent detection and they don’t give a shit about that anyway. This isn’t a James Bond or John Wick movie so let’s not pretend silenced gunshots aren’t still unbelievably loud.

    A better question is how can other cops bring a rifle into a densely populated area WITHOUT a silencer?

    • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Single shots from rifles do not cause permanent hearing loss.

      A better question is how can other cops bring a rifle into a densely populated area WITHOUT a silencer?

      I dont even know how to respond to this part. Maybe don’t have the cops come in with the expectations to use the weapon?

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not commenting on the other parts of this discussion but a single shot from a rifle absolutely CAN cause permanent hearing damage. Even some weapons suppressed are still loud enough to damage your hearing over a short amount of time/multiple shoots. Have you ever seen or watched news of cops shooting someone and NOT firing multiple rounds?
        Of all the tactical battle rattle these ICE dorks are wearing to capture people, I think suppressors are the least worrisome; should maybe even be mandatory for law enforcement in urban environments. That’s coming from my experience shooting in the Marines and being a hobby shooter since then.

      • jonesey71@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I would prefer the cops not have any guns at all. They would certainly be more polite. If they are going to go do something that would need a gun they need a warrant and then 5 pages of requisition forms filled out in triplicate to request the guns.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not like they’ve been trained in any de-escalation techniques, if they’ve been trained at all.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      serious question about guns and silencers, but if it was just a tiny gun, would it not be pretty quiet and work as expected like if someone was in a bathroom and the people in the bar wouldn’t hear it?

      The bigger the gun the more noise it’d make though for sure.

      • domdanial@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        A suppressor on a subsonic .22 caliber gun is about as close to movie/video game quiet as you can expect. There is still variation, but subsonic ammo eliminates the “crack” from the sonic boom (comes from the bullet itself), and the suppressor reduces the muzzle noise a lot. In person I’ve heard one suppressed subsonic .22, and it was about the level of a good clap. 👏

        • modus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          When shoot subsonic suppressed 22lr, you hear the click of the action and the bullet whizzing down the range. It’s crazy.

          • domdanial@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Must have been a quieter one than I heard then lol. I’ve seen videos like that, I just assumed they were like, absolute best case purpose built

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        A good answer to your question needs more specifics, but in general, suppressed handguns with home-defense or target ammo are still loud enough to gain attention.

        On the other hand, subsonic ammo will be pretty quiet and reduce the noise drastically, but unless you have the semi-auto mechanics tuned properly, the gun won’t cycle the next round in very well. I can’t speak to the stopping power of subsonic ammo but again, it probably requires specifics to give an accurate answer.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    These are people who think they’re playing CounterStrike for a living. Of course they’re going to look the part.

  • vala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because these are just random dudes who bring their own personal weapons from home. It’s like a fashion show for them.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      …perhaps we’ll be fortunate to see them perform as poorly as stanced cars when the revolution comes…