• Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    To be fair, for me the fact that they content is now spread across many subscription services is the problem more than Netflix’s price or current quality.

    Once I set are services, torrent and jellyfin for all of the others, I’m not making exceptions for Netflix

    • Zengen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its ironic. On a decentralized platform we are discussing how a big issue with streaming services is that they are not centralized -

      I dont even disagree with you. I just think its interesting that we dont apply the ideological standard of centralization and monopoly being inherently bad evenly across the board.

      Im not really sure I have a greater point to make here. I’m not trying to knock or dissent what your saying at all.

      Just a stoned observation.

      • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s exclusivity deals that are the problem. Governments should legislate them away so that there can be competition.

        Then we’d all choose the marketplace of our preference. Like supermarkets.

        Video streaming, music streaming, games consoles, even mobile OSs all could benefit from some anti-monopoly legislation.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I see your point, but I don’t think this would qualify as decentralized. It went from 1 to maybe 8 players depending on where you are, but they are separated and closed. Each one of them is centralized, it’s just that there are several competing ones. Each one is taking away their shows or making some third party ones exclusive, so the more there are, the less vale each provides.

        And of course the issue is that each one has to be paid separately, so there’s a economic incentive to participate in as few as you can.

        With Lemmy for instance, you might want want an instance that’s very connected with others, one that’s quite closed and focussed or even create several users or even spin your own instance to have it your way.

        • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Excellent point. Calling the current streaming landscape decentralized is like calling the current social media landscape decentralized, since you can choose between twitter, reddit, tiktok, or meta. It’s unfortunate that it’s unlikely that a properly decentralized network for video will exist, since the hosting costs are so astronomical.

          • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            A centralized service’s hosting costs are astronomical because they are trying to serve the whole world. Is your Plex server hosting cost astronomical? What if you share it with friends? Everyone contributes to a decentralized service. Piracy is decentralized, and the hosting costs are not astronomical.

    • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yet streaming music has basically the same artists no matter which service you use. And Tidal integrates with Plex seamlessly with my own local collection. Worth the subscription for that.

      Do that. (But they won’t)