She claims LGBTQ+ rights need to be restricted to “protect kids,” but she appointed a man who admitted to having sex with a minor to a high-level position.

Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders ®, who has repeatedly pledged to “protect kids” with anti-LGBTQ+ laws, appointed a man to a top state prison post even though he had previously been fired from a local police force for receiving oral sex from a teen girl in a post office parking lot.

Jamol Jones, who Sanders appointed as chairman to the Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board in January, resigned last Friday after news agencies reported that the Benton Police Department fired him after he admitted to an internal affairs investigator that he had sexual relations as an adult with a 17-year-old girl, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported.

    • Infynis@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Doesn’t matter if you have a position of power over the minor. If you’re a cop for example

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If she is allowed to do dangerous work in abattoirs, she can consent to sex.

        • Sarah Huckabee Sanders, probably
    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      In Sweden too. I think. Or is it 15 still? Nån färsk torsk som vet?

      Anyway, I think this is the first time Sweden and Arkansas have ever had anything in common. I don’t know if I should laud them for being so progressive and enlightened as us Europeans, or if I should make me more suspicious of Swedes.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        We don’t say shit like thay around here, bud. Go somewhere else.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          49
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Then let me rephrase, the only people who bring up the age of consent in this context are incredibly suspicious.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            The top level comment is literally accusing him of breaking a law that is dependent on the minor’s age. Pointing to the fact that he didn’t actually violate the law because the person was old enough to legally consent as suspicious says more about your insecurities than the person who lives in reality.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              11 months ago

              He did break the law by having sex with a minor while being a police officer. That is a crime, and he was fired for it and lying about it to internal affairs. He just wasn’t prosecuted because reasons.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Fair enough, I did not read the whole article, hypocritically. I decided to read the rest and see if is a violation of state law, but I would be curious if that it’s statutory rape.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            11 months ago

            Stating a fact is not agreeing with the fact. If they brought it up randomly at a dinner party after talking about kids, yes that’s suspicious. But, this is a conversation about a person who had sex with a minor, and naturally the question of “what came of that?” could be considered. The answer would be “nothing,” but only because the age of consent law was not broken in that state. If the age of consent law was broken, it’s likely the person would have a Felony. States have different laws, and they need to be considered for everyone to understand the situation.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Someone insisted it should be called statutory rape. I fact checked. If you find fact checking suspicious, that’s a you problem.

            • lrrkr@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              statute is a nebulous term with no legal definition UNDER THE LAW

              • x4740N@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                Dude, dudette, they/them stop playing the fool

                You know your arguments are frivolous and made in bad faith

                You just want to be the troll because thats what you enjoy doing

                It’s like an addiction for you because you get your dopamine hit from it

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Do you know what the word “statutory” means? They were making a factual correction.