Lemmy admins: we designed Lemmy to speak truth to power.

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting. Is .ml the only one running 19.5? Because I don’t really see that pattern from any other instance in the mod logs, though I’m not really watching that closely.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah ok I appreciate the information. Seems like kind of a shit way to handle federating bans.

        Just out of curiosity, does that mean your instance could choose to not enforce bans from other instances or am I misunderstanding how ban federation works? Before it seemed like the home instance would accept votes and comments and they would be rejected by the remote instance, but had a chance to successfully federate with third instances. Now it seems as if the home instance is doing that enforcement directly. Is that correct?

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          No the site ban still worked. This ban per community is mostly to be able to remove their content when banned as it otherwise doesn’t trigger.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            On several occasions I have held conversations with third instance users on .ml threads while I was site banned from .ml. I am trying to drill down into the technical changes whereby bans now actually “reject” comments and votes, seemingly from the home instance, compared to the previous behavior