It may be the first time a drone has destroyed a helicopter in mid-air.

Ukrainian forces deploy more than 100,000 explosive first-person-view drones a month all along the 700-mile front line of Russia’s 28-month wider war on Ukraine. The drones smash into armored vehicles, chase down exposed infantry and follow artillery fire back to its origin in order to target Russian howitzers.

And today one of the small quadcopter drones—remotely steered by an operator wearing a virtual-reality headset—shot down a Russian helicopter, apparently for the first time.

Photos and videos that circulated on social media depict the Mil Mi-8 transport helicopter burning near Donetsk in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine. “A speedy recovery to the survivors,” one Russian blogger wrote.

This new use of explosive drones has been a long time coming. As long ago as September, Ukrainian operators first tried ramming their flying robots into Russian helicopters mid-flight. The drone threat got so serious that the Russian air force began assigning some helicopters to escort other helicopters.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not wishing at all. As soon as it happens, they’ll outlaw all drones. They won’t be covered under the 2nd amendment of course.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They won’t be covered under the 2nd amendment of COurse.

        What if I strap a gun? Then it’s patriotic and family friendly!

        • Juice@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have a constitutional right to glue an Uzi to a quadcopter to protect my GMC Sierra

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I would be absolutely astonished if as part of the no-fly zone established at these rallies that they don’t have frequency jammers at the very minimum.

        I feel it’s only a matter of time before they put a plexiglass bunker surrounding the president at the very least.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          We’re getting to the point where even a frequency jammer might not stop an AI piloted drone. Just teach the drone what a ‘rally’ looks like and where the target typically stands, and then launch it. No radio or GPS signals required.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            All of the public events now have some heavy anti drone measures set up. Like the Olympics currently.

            I’m not sure how this works as they often rely on drones for filming though. So it’s not jamming.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was reading a company in Ukraine has completed a functioning drone that does just this. Basically permits it to fire-and-forget as it has basic optimal image recognition built into a chip. Crazy.

            Alternatively if you knew the target’s static location, you could bypass GPS and controller jamming by utilizing good 'ol fashioned orienteering principles with an accelerometer, compass, and provided coordinates.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          For that rally they didn’t have it. It’s in the report. And yes the entire security world spit their coffee out when we found that out.