• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 个月前

      the morons who registered teh domain, signed it over to the government ‘for safe keeping’ and then the government turned into the literal taliban.

      dont sign your domains over to some foreign power or youre gunna have a bad time

    • tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 个月前

      It’s got nothing to do with Mastodon. Mastodon did not “comply” because Mastodon has no say one way or the other.

      Where TLDs are associated with particular countries then the national registrar for that country controls who is allocated domains under it.

      Example: ‘.fr’ is associated with France and is controlled by a French organisation.

      ‘.af’ is similarly controlled by an Afghanistan organisation and they can choose to grant or revoke ownership of domains under that TLD however they like.

      The Mastodon instance will need to move to a new domain.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 个月前

          This is the internet equivalent of choosing to open a gay bar in Kabul instead of San Francisco.

          There were plenty of safe spaces, they chose terribly.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 个月前

          The national top-level domains are MEANT to be controlled by their relevant nation-states. They are not intended to be part of vanity URLs.

          So there’s nothing to “fix” here. This is the system working as intended, basically.

        • tiramichu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 个月前

          Some amount of centralisation in domain management is necessary, in order to agree who owns what.

          Devolving control of TLDs to respective nations was actually a GOOD idea because it means each country can operate those TLDs in a way that fits their needs, which is already much better than all global TLDs being operated by a single organisation.

          The main mistake is that queer .af chose to register a domain controlled by a government who was very likely to have problems with what they were using it for.

          Nowadays there are a large number of ‘new’ TLDs which are not nationally controlled and may be a better choice.