youTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agoEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageEveryday we stray further from industry standardslemmy.worldyouTellMe@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoIf that’s a pass through, that’s bad. If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
minus-squaresebsch@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 days agoThere is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.
If that’s a pass through, that’s bad.
If that’s used for authentication, authorization, credential limiting, or rate limiting, then sure.
There is no context in this world validating this level of unsanitized SQL. Even for internal use this is bad, since it bypasses the auth of server and dbms.