Kamala Harris’s running mate urges popular vote system but campaign says issue is not part of Democrats’ agenda

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Finally the dems are saying it out loud. They should have been yelling this from the treetops since Bush vs Gore.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The first step towards change is elevating the conversation to high office, though, so this is something.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        The popular vote contract sounds interesting, but I like ranked voting more because it allows flexibility in sampling the public opinion of who they’d want. Think of any question a poll could ask you where you feel there isn’t a clear yes/no or single answer. Isn’t it better when it allows you to pick from a few choices that together reflect your answer? An election not only could turn out more voters, it could give statistical nuances on how people lean among the ones that voted in the winner. Eg., how many that voted both Democrat candidate as well as certain other parties.

        Just had a thought that we could even see a person vote Democrat and Republican on a ticket. But at least they got their vote in and showed how they’re torn.

        • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, the compact is definitely a way to get around the current system, not to overhaul it (which it desperately needs but would require 2/3 approval instead of >50% of the electoral college). I agree that if we are able to get constitutional amendments on the table, we should be looking at ranked choice or approval voting systems! But one of the big issues right now is unfamiliarity with either of those systems, and a lot of familiarity with popular choice. That’s why it’s so important that the many, many local and statewide initiatives for ranked choice get support!

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Agreed, the more we see ranked choice locally the more support there will be to expand it. Also “easier” to get it changed at that level.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The popular vote contract sounds interesting, but I like ranked voting more

          Those solve two different problems. The first solves the problem of a candidate winning despite having fewer votes; the second solves the spoiler effect.

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am imagining a future when an amendment is ratified in the proper technique and Uncle Thomas just says “nah. Also, we give outselves that power. So, away go a bunch of other amendments!”

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      By 2032 Texas will be a solid swing state and the EC becomes near impossible for the GOP to ever win again

      We can wait them out, and reap the benefits

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        People argued this idea of a permanent Democratic majority in the 2000s and then again after Obama’s election but it never materialized. GenX, with its liberal sensibilities, the rise of college educations, and increased diversity among the population will make it impossible for Republicans to win. Then GenX got older and more conservative and people realized that minorities and college grads could also be made to hate immigrants and queer people.

        This idea that “just waiting” is all it will take to end conservatism and other bigotries is a fantasy.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          could also be made to hate immigrants and queer people.

          Less that and more that it turns out a lot of people don’t vote based on how their candidate or his party feels about immigrants and queer people. There are even a lot of single issue voters whose single issue isn’t immigration or queer people.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Regardless, the only feasible way to go from the EC to the Popular vote will be if Republicans think they’ve lost the advantage the EC gives them.

      • MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are two issues:

        • Parties aren’t set in stone, Republicans will shift some positions to appear more palatable and move some states redder

        • If they take power now they are likely to increase Gerrymandering and voter suppression to give themselves an advantage.