• GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Remember these are the same engineers who put the Magic Mouse charging port on the bottom, making the mouse unusable while you charge it

    • million@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      People treat it like a mistake but not be able to use the mouse while it’s plugged in is the entire point of the design. Right or wrong the Apple designers thought a cord drag was a bad experience and designed to prevent it.

      They probably looked at their target audience and realized there was a certain percentage of folks that would just leave the mouse on the cord 24/7 and wanted to prevent that.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They also know their target audience has plenty of people who gobble up every bad design decision and even defend it online years later.

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I don’t understand what was wrong with the original version that just took 2 AA batteries. Reaching for the AA charger and swapping cells not awkward enough or something?

        Smart and elegant design would be hiding a battery charger in the iMac it self (maybe even use something smaller than AA), not expect you to flip and plug in your mouse every time ya leave it. The Nintendo Switch, while a completely different form factor, is a great example of an elegant (you could even say “wireless”) charging solution.

        I’m getting really sick of the Apple esthetic of sticking out wires, be it the mouse or the dozen dongles for every portable device they now make. Uh! Can’t forget the world’s only pen that needs charging, for seemingly no reason.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They can fit a bigger rechargeable battery in the same space as a battery bay for replaceable batteries. Plus it eliminates the waste of throwing away batteries, and has longer battery life than similarly sized alkalines.

          • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Honestly don’t feel like a slight reduction on a month long battery life is of much concern. As for waste, I’d say being able to replace a dead battery should reduce waste if anything, also nobody said it must be a AA (on a side note, you seem to imply the use of non-rechargeable AA, which holy shit, if they’re still a thing, must be purged, sweet jesus…who’s dumb enough to waste money on em???). Personally, I’d much prefer having a second battery charging separately somewhere, ready to swap, as opposed to being forced to stop using my computer. Or like the Nintendo Switch I mentioned before, have some spot I can put it away for charing, that way the mouse is also cleaned up and not fucking dangling and wobbling around freely on the table.

            • Anivia@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              (on a side note, you seem to imply the use of non-rechargeable AA, which holy shit, if they’re still a thing, must be purged, sweet jesus…who’s dumb enough to waste money on em???)

              You should probably educate yourself on the advantages of rechargeable and single use AA batteries before calling other people dumb for still using Alkaline batteries.

              Rechargeable NiMH batteries are great for most usecases, but even the ones that are designed to have a low self-discharge rate still are much worse in that regard than Alkaline batteries. There are simply use cases where rechargeable AA batteries make no sense and you are much better off with regular Alkaline batteries.

              • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Thanks for not providing even a single example… I tried looking around and only found relatively niche use cases, like them being more reliable and resistant (while also being lighter) for extreme environments or infrequent use, for example emergency equipment. And then some people choosing em because they don’t feel like investing more into it, when they have only a couple devices that drain the batteries slowly, let’s say a clock that lasts a year. That could be easily fixed if you could exchange empty batteries for full ones like with gass tanks and similar, and the prior examples aren’t a good enough reason to have such batteries in the convenience store.

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Anything that has a very low power draw. You already listed one of the common examples: a clock. Due to rechargeable NiMH batteries having a high self-discharge rate you would have to replace the battery every year, whilst an Alkaline battery would last 5 to 10 years. Other common household items that are a good example would be TV remotes, smoke alarms, or smart home devices like light switches.

      • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        People treat it like a mistake, but the Emperor has no clothes and people are catching on.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t understand why this is so hard to understand. You’re supposed to stop using the mouse while it is charging, and use the mouse unplugged. That’s the purpose. It’s not a stupid decision, it just prevents some user’s preferred operation of using the mouse while it is charging

        • discount_door_garlic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          “it prevents some users’ preferred operation of using the mouse while its charging”

          “It’s not a stupid decision”

          • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not a stupid decision, but a stubborn one.

            I’m 100% OK with that; Apple is heavy on design aesthetics. If a user doesn’t like that, they can just use their own preferred mouse - wired or otherwise.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I used to buy Macs when I was a teenager and young adult, but finally grew tired of the “my way or the highway” approach to design.

            Windows is guilty of this too, but it’s more subtle, but getting worse all the time with w11.

            Linux has more of a “you break it, you buy it” approach to design lol

            • bamboo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m the reverse. As I get older, all the things I used to consider deal breakers just don’t matter as much. I don’t really care about how upgradable or repairable the device is, I’m just gonna pay Apple for the upgrade and pay them again to fix it. Whenever I have to solve an issue on my gaming PC I get an inch closer to just throwing it out and buying whatever overpriced gaming laptop comes working out of the box.

                • bamboo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If I could game on my MacBook Pro I already would be. There’s a decent library of games that can run but it’s a lot more work than a windows or Linux box if you want to venture beyond 64-bit native ports.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You’re supposed to stop using the mouse while it is charging, and use the mouse unplugged.

          Why? Says who? There’s been a few times where I’ve booted my work laptop up in the morning and my mouse is dead and I’ve had to plug it in. Once it’s charged I unplug it. What’s the harm in that? I’d be way more furstrated if I had to open up my laptop (I keep it closed with an external monitor) and use the trackpad instead.

          • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Says the designer or design team, backed by whoever is over them who approved the decision.

            As for why? For design reasons. To make it prettier so it sells more units. To fit in with the brand’s minimalist theme they’ve got going on.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, the mouse charger screams marketing or management. Apple’s brand is partially form over function.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was very likely a designers decision. It forces the use the use case they wanted; wireless mice should be used wirelessly. I would bet they fought marketing and management to get this on the final product.

        Marketing would want the mouse they can advertise as being useable with and wireless. Female ports are easier to mount and manufacture with they have depth to set the socket. So a plug on the front is much cheaper and easier to manufacture.

        The fact the charging cable doesn’t get used in motion means it will last longer and you wouldn’t have people useing fraying cables on the front of their mouse.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s better for display

          Users aren’t trying before they buy so the display is the most important aspect

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Users aren’t trying before they buy so the display is the most important aspect

            Trying before you buy is literally the entire point of the apple store

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                When I check out a device in the store I definitely pick it up, hold it, turn it over, and generally look at every part of it. Things like a charging port on the bottom would probably stick out…

                Or like in this case, with the power button on the bottom, I’d definitely notice that as annoying.

                What software do they let you load?

                Basically anything you want, they don’t tend to watch you at the apple store, unless you seem like you actually want to buy something. They want you to mess around with the machines, so I’ve never seen them password protected in any way, you have admin access.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah and I hear they might bring that back lol. Why haven’t there been any wireless mice that use wireless charging? They could include a super thin coil that you could place under any mouse pad. It doesn’t even need to charge fast so heat shouldn’t be an issue. Just trickle charge when it’s not being used.

      Edit: guess I should have searched first. Of course it was Logitech

    • JWBananas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even worse, that was done intentionally. They wanted to prevent retail stores from leaving them plugged in at all times.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That’s not true at all. Apple likes minimalism, and putting ports and buttons where you can’t see them adds to the aesthetic.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I get that, but it doesn’t really make sense with a mouse as I pretty much never see the front of it as it’s always ahead of me. The only person who would see it would be if someone were to be sat opposite.