• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry. The fascist regime will be issuing counterfeit passes to anyone who wants one.

      • EABOD25@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Real talk, every time I go home, my parents throw the word around everywhere (In their home. They suck, but aren’t stupid). They justify it by saying “it’s just a trashy person of any color”. So I tell them to go ahead use it in public to see what the response is. I still don’t think they’ve tried it. At least not in any circles that will get them in an ass whooping situation

        • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Father in-law was throwing it around like it was nothing last Thanksgiving and we haven’t been over since.

          I don’t play that shit.

          Every time he used it, “I’m not racist” was said soon after. Sure Dan-o, interesting word choice considering.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s a fantastic response/challenge.

          Essentially: put your money where your mouth is.

          Narrator: they didn’t.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I will not. Your parents are racist idiots. You are rewarding them with a visit. So they put money directly in your account or do they press cash into your palm?

              Now then: People have different definitions of rich/middle class. Depending on the person, let’s use me as an example. I will buy a house with a loan soon. I’m not even close to middle class. In fact I think our parents were the last of the middle class.

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                So they put money directly in your account or do they press cash into your palm?

                How exactly did you get to this from ‘visiting parents’?

                Are you that transactional?

              • D1G17AL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Dude, chill the fuck out. You are directing a weird level of anger at SOMEONE ELSE’S PARENTS. Calm your ass down.

      • wetsoggybread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Honestly they stole the word from white men, its just time for them to take back what rightfully belongs! /s

  • Qkall@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    fuck man… I chuckled hard. but i willingly gave that up a few years ago… didn’t feel right growing up in the burbs.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    I may have brain damage, but I can’t see this image without hearing Morpheus’ voice in my head screaming: “NEEOOOOO WAKE UP NEEEEOOO!”

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Sorry, I’m a latino, Mexicano, living in México, so I don’t really have the slightest idea of how did this happen. Can someone give it a try?

    EDIT: While I appreciate all of your replies, I’m even more confused as I see people mentioning “hispanic americans” as a synonym for “latino”. This was an interesting read about the confusion. However, the reasons seem to be addressed against Hispanic Americans, but the meme os against Latinos. It feels a bit artificial or even prejudicial. Sorry for this edit, I’m not really sure about what I’m trying to say.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hispanic Americans are overwhelmingly working class, and (unlikely black people) don’t see themselves as a single unified minority group, so they don’t feel the sting of Republican racism pointed towards them.

      Why doesn’t working class matter? Because such people generally aren’t as involved in following politics and policy type stuff as white collar folks. So they are swayed by other factors like masculinity signalling. This is obviously why Trump added Hulk Hogan, and of course standing up and pumping his fist after getting nicked in the ear by a terrible sniper helped too.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because such people generally aren’t as involved in following politics and policy type stuff as white collar folks. So they are swayed by other factors like masculinity signalling.

        If only there was a party that had education about policies part of their ideology.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mexico has been a tidal wave of leftist political energy. Its so funny to hear Mayo Americans complain about electing one of their own, after they turned out in droves for him.

    • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      60
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lemmi-nistas are out in full force pretending Kamala didn’t run a horrible campaign.

      She offered nothing for working class and then refused to sit down with Rogan.

        • SwordandArt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          As much as I hate the guy he has a broad reach but I don’t think it would have changed a damn thing if she sat with him.

          • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            1 month ago

            If she smoked a fat one that took some of that corporate frost out of her I’d take a second look.

              • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I was a never Trump. It was a minor miracle that we got Biden to step down. I accepted that Harris was the best we could do. I kept my mouth shut when she said she was pro fraking. I kept my mouth shut when she didn’t condemn Israel. I kept my mouth shut when she cozied up to Dick and Liz Cheney. Harris and the DNC have lost the fucking plot and if she went off script on the Rogan show and offered her true opinions that would have been inspirational. Fuck, even Obama’s very active endorsement couldn’t save her.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          What matters is - he’s got huge mostly Republican audience and she could have used it to raise ideas.

          For free.

          That’s a law in this country - platform must be provided to both parties and she didn’t take her chance.

          This just emphasizes that she was a bad candidate and she can’t talk without teleprompter.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          $25,000

          that was a fraud proposal. dems would have never been able to pass it and they know it.
          just like student loans - it would have been killed in congress or senate.
          The idea behind such proposals - is then democrats could just blame republicans “see - we tried it, but those GOP mean sunova bitches”.
          but dont even worry about it. kamala or not - you would have never seen this money.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          pathetic McDonald’s stunt

          but it worked. the stunt worked.
          i am just amazed democrats couldnt come up with similar thing.

          FFS - kamala could have setup a lemonade stand near some factory and talked to workers.
          She could have worked in a soup kitchen one day and do small talk with homeless people - media would eat that up.

          or offer some new policies from Bernie playbook - like mandatory vacations and single payer medical.

          instead - all we got was complete and utter lack of initiative. lazy ass dem leadership is completely useless

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            FFS - kamala could have setup a lemonade stand near some factory and talked to workers. She could have worked in a soup kitchen one day and do small talk with homeless people - media would eat that up.

            Raising a billion dollars in a matter of months and then pissing it away just as quickly, so you can lose in a landslide, with nothing material left behind that anyone might have been proud of.

            We do it every couple of years, and it always feels like such a fucking waste.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve been waiting since quite some time before the election for you to tell me which of the four options Hoosiers should have voted for in 2024.

              Weird that you won’t answer.

              Maybe you forgot the options and the fact that candidates have to declare themselves as write-ins, but no one did so that was not an option.

              Here they are:

              I’m sure you’ll answer this time and not look like you’ve been here dishonestly, in bad faith for months.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 month ago

                tell me which of the four options Hoosiers should have voted for in 2024.

                Vote Your Conscience. Unfortunately, the only person on the list who isn’t genocidal appears to be Chase Oliver.

                Weird that you won’t answer.

                Weird you didn’t ask until after the election.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Chase Oliver

                  Got it. You think that people should vote for a person who was to the right of Trump that wants to dismantle the whole safety net. So I guess we all know where you stand politically now.

                  Weird you didn’t ask until after the election.

                  That is a lie. I asked you multiple times before the election.

                  But then I guess lying is the stock and trade of the far right.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The problem Is that he is a dipshit a lot of people listen to. And Kamala had a chance to reach those people and try to change their ideas or at least make them aware of her ideas, but she refused so they never had a chance to begin with

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          He is a dipshit with a huge audience who seems to always blindly agree with whoever he’s talking to.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          She can’t talk - that’s the problem.

          Democrats hiding Biden condition until he had to drop out - is the problem.

          Democrats not holding quick primaries when Biden dropped out - is the problem.

          • D1G17AL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Democrats running Clinton in 2016 - is the real problem. If Biden had run back then he would have likely won and Trump would never have tried again after that. He would’ve been humiliated.

              • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                too immature to elect a woman.

                this is the preachy rhetoric that got Trump elected.
                as a voter - i don’t give 2 shits if president is a man or a woman, I want the most qualified person who will give me the most of my interests.
                most people would get extremely annoyed when they are told to vote for a woman in order to be considered “mature”. wtf. seriously?

                she was a weak candidate, couldn’t talk and offered nothing for the working class

            • Veneroso@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Clinton in 1992 buddy. It’s neo liberalism all the way down.

              Neo liberalism is Reaganomics but for Democrats and Obama ran his entire 8 years on it.

              Biden at least did a little bit of progressive things before Manchin and Sienema threw their clogs into the gears. They should have been threatened to be primaried THEN. Not after holding the Senate hostage until the midterms flipped the house.

        • rational_lib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah there would’ve been no defending this if it happened. Rogan controls the mics and would do whatever he could to end her campaign right there. Maga would post all over X (with Elon’s amplification) that she got “owned” as Rogan shouted over her her, and the left would be angry that she appeared on his show in the first place. It would have been a pure loss.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Who gives a damn, it’s Republican listeners base is what is important.
          She can’t handle those high pressure meetings makes her a bad candidate. I mean the whole reason she was even running is Biden assigned her by decree, she would have never won in the fair primaries and that’s what Democrats should have done.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Did you even listen to the audio where he was just yelling over the lady and didn’t ever give her a chance to say anything?

            Do you think that would have been in any way productive?

            • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I did listen and while Rogan is unbearable to me, I do think a presidential candidate can’t say no to an invitation to someone with this reach. If the interview were to be like your link, that would have helped Harris in the end, in my opinion. It’s Joe Rogan the one acting like an idiot here, not the caller. Even if his audience may love him, I don’t know, the population that do not have any attachment for the guy would stand on Harris’ side.

            • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              So what? It’s 3 hours, I’m sure she would have been able to get something out. Rogan is not stupid, he understands the difference between random lady and a potencial commander in chief . She should have gone to Infowars while she’s at it, I’m not joking. Step out of your comfort zone and reach the audience you don’t typically reach.

              Dems should stop being such a pussies

                • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  He does this yelling stunts to entertain his audience. They like that, - that’s the format.
                  It’s not stupid on his end - clearly he makes millions from it.

                  Raw Republican audience she could have easily reached and talked about things they care about - jobs, working class needs.

          • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Considering how many previous Dem voters stayed home, trying to play to moderate RINOs she’d have never gotten anyway was clearly not the right play

          • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That was staged, he never actually worked at all. Harris had actually been an employee there previously. No idea why the campaign didn’t take that obvious win, but to call it a smart stunt for Trump is asinine

            • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Ofc it was staged for many reasons such as security.
              And guess what - none of it matters. His supporters not gonna investigate that, they saw a picture that improved his standing with the working class and it worked.

              How many Latino votes he pulled just by frying fries?

              Ffs Kamala could have done similar stunt - worked in a fake soup kitchen, or something

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The Democratic campaign underestimated just how stupid, racist, and misogynistic the average US citzen is. Don’t get me wrong, they should’ve known and definitely could’ve ran a better campaign, but this is mostly on Americans being too dumb to know what’s best for them.

        I personally don’t blame any minorities, considering white men and women were by far the most prominent Trump voters. The US is a country of racist dumbasses.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        With you on the first line, but sitting down with Rogan would not have changed anything. Especially with Rogans preferential treatment of right wing figures if anyone’s been paying attention. But the DNC 100% fucked up.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You lose 100% of chances not taken.

          I think she could have went to the show and talked about what’s important to working people

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        She offered nothing for working class and then refused to sit down with Rogan.

        One of these is unforgiveable. But also, after liberals went absolutely apeshit over Bernie sitting down with Rogan, I can see why Harris was hesitant.

        I also remember when people were very excited about student debt relief and an increased min wage and the Green New Deal jobs program and finally putting an end to Kids In Cages and Gitmo and the ugly foreign wars and… Oops.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          But also, after liberals went absolutely apeshit over Bernie sitting down with Rogan, I can see why Harris was hesitant.

          She did literally every other thing she could to court Republicans in the past two months and didn’t care that it pissed off a chunk of her base, why stop there? (OTOH it won her zero R votes, so there’s that. I’m sure they won’t try THAT tactic again. /s)

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      When they stop pretending to be offended on behalf of minority groups…

      Actually I’m not qualified to even joke about that.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah fuck minorities! It’s their fault the democrats lost and no one else’s, least of all the democrats themselves!

    • nature_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      So exhausted of the minority bashing on lemmy and other leftist/alternative social media, it was here before but it got way worse after the election. Anybody who thinks its ok to judge an entire population of peoples based on the political associations of some is fucking stupid and can fuck right off.

      • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lol. Have you seen people on Lemmy talking about “conservatives” or “Republicans” this is literally Lemmy’s only way of thinking.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      One of the reasons why I took a break from Lemmy for election week is I stopped being able to tell Hasbera from Democrats. In fact, the Hasbera are still trolling on Lemmy and reddit, blaming Palestinians for Harris’s lost.

      We have been arguing Democrats are a party without a people for a long time. At this point, I honestly feel anything I type is lost to the void

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s incredibly infuriating. And the worst part is you already see democrat mainstream media types setting their crosshairs on trans people. In 2028, the democratic party will run on the 2024 republican platform, just like they ran on the 2020 republican platform today, and there’s nothing we can do to stop it, because of these idiotic shitlibs.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sorry for replying so late. If the Democrats come out of this thinking only conservatives vote; it’s simply a sign we require (not simply want) a different party.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds. Which group are you going after next? Trans people? Jews?

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        If anyhing, it’s fucking hilarious, and they deserve to be laughed at. Maybe you won’t do dumb shit next time if you’re scared it’ll be used to make you look bad

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Man… when I lived in Los Angeles. Latinos hated blacks, it surprised me - I heard some crazy shit that made me look like ಠ_ಠ

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just the zoomers with brain rot. Black voters went from like 90% to 80% Democrats.

      You’re probably confused because some headline said Trump doubled his support among black men and it didn’t mention the baseline was 15%. Which is, ya know, fucking stupid of them in the first place but it is what it is.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The shift is kind of what’s important. Actual black woman Kamala Harris couldn’t maintain the same level of support among black voters as Joe “You Ain’t Black” Biden. There are some pretty severe flaws in Harris’s campaign strategy that we need to study and rectify in the next four years.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not a political scientist, so these words carry no weight. That being said, she needed to convince people to vote for her, but she spent her whole campaign trying to convince people not to vote Trump. She needed stronger policy proposals. She needed to run on something like Medicare for all or raising the minimum wage. Ignore Trump entirely, and convince people to vote for her.

            Instead, she promised more of the same that we’ve had for the last four years, in a time when most people are struggling more than they have in their entire lives. To the majority of voters, any change is perceived as an improvement, even if it’s a profoundly retarded change like introducing 100% tariffs on every import.

            • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Anyone who was not voting against Trump by default shouldnt be voting at all. I dont blame her for expecting to operate in a world of sanity

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Anyone who was not voting against Trump by default shouldnt be voting at all.

                They didn’t vote, and that’s why we lost. We can absolutely blame her for not knowing what the landscape was like. Her goal was to win an election, not make her supporters feel good and smart and special. The people who don’t vote for us by default are actually the exact people that we need to persuade to vote for us

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                If she was campaigning based on how the world should work instead of how the world works then she wasn’t playing by the rules of the game, and that’s her fault, no one else’s. It’s like complaining about the EC after an election. The EC is part of the game. Part of the mechanics, part of the rules. If you know it’s there going into the game, you ought to be playing a very different game than someone who doesn’t know it exists.

                (The EC should be removed, to be clear, but you don’t run a presidential election pretending it’s not there, and you don’t run a presidential election you want to win without expecting to sell voters on yourself by some metric other than not being your opponent.)

                And yes, since it seems you have to say this as part of every such comment now, I voted for her. But she and her campaign are absolutely not blameless in this outcome.