Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoSure, WSJ. Next do an article on Selection Biaspoptalk.scrubbles.techexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1490arrow-down121file-text
arrow-up1469arrow-down1external-linkSure, WSJ. Next do an article on Selection Biaspoptalk.scrubbles.techScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square85fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAvatar_of_Self@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoIf millinial births start in 1980 then a millinial could have been 29 in 2009.
minus-squareRatzChatsubo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 month ago1980 is definitely gen x
minus-squareAvatar_of_Self@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI was born after 1980. It isn’t definitely generation x because the definition has changed since millennials were called generation y/why. So a person born in 1981 would have been 28 years old in 2009. It doesn’t change anything.
If millinial births start in 1980 then a millinial could have been 29 in 2009.
1980 is definitely gen x
I was born after 1980. It isn’t definitely generation x because the definition has changed since millennials were called generation y/why. So a person born in 1981 would have been 28 years old in 2009. It doesn’t change anything.