• AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    14 days ago

    Retired firefighter/paramedic here. It’s simple: Fire departments don’t normally generate revenue. It’s a money-sink and local governments don’t like that. The first things financially cut when I worked for a city of 170,000 were always services that didn’t make money. That’s just how it works.

    Why police departments need heavy armor and assault accoutrements is beyond me, though. I mean, all that shit didn’t help whatsoever in most mass-shootings.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      It’s a money-sink and local governments don’t like that. The first things financially cut when I worked for a city of 170,000 were always services that didn’t make money. That’s just how it works.

      The whole point of government is to collect taxes to pay for stuff that isn’t revenue generating to spread out the costs!

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              All of them? I’m not sure I understand the question.

              First result on google for “socialism definition” as an example

              a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

              Governments running businesses is what “owning the means of production” means, in every context, by every definition.

    • FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      14 days ago

      They need to understand it’s a service, not a business. Sure, a fire department doesn’t make money but, neither does a city that burns to the ground.

      As a society, we have simply got to get past the notion that everything that exists needs to be monetized to be deemed worthy of existence.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        14 days ago

        You don’t even need to go that far. From a financial perspective, a fire department is a hedge bet against fire. It doesn’t exist to generate revenue, but it limit losses.

        Not unlike fire insurance, except insurance only protects against the validation of property while a fire fighting team protects the real assets.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 days ago

        They don’t think that way. “It does not generate revenue, therefore it cannot be allowed to exist.” This philosophy is so deeply ingrained into the American psyche that it is inescapable.

        Story time: American colleague and Canadian colleague are talking. Canadian says that university costs only 5000 CAD in tuition. American nearly falls out of his chair and yells, “BUT HOW DO THEY MAKE MONEY??”

        And bear in mind that he was one of the most educated and successful people I have ever met, and yet he found it so difficult to fathom that a university could exist without making money. Now with that in mind, imagine convincing a large group of average people to fund public services.

        This is why the USA is the way that it is.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 days ago

      I saw Rebel Ridge on Netflix, could very well be that police departments generate revenue through Civil Forfeiture.

      (It’s a fictional thriller, not a documentary, but very much based on modern realities)

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      The government isn’t a business, for fuck’s sake! Some services like police, fire, health are necessary, but don’t generate revenue! Also, even the most profitable corporations on the planet still have IT, Management, and HR departments that don’t technically make money.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes, And?

      Of course it’s a sink. With that reasoning, taxes are sinks for citizens. The entire oiintis that you get something back for it .

      • Cheems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I think to the mass of people, if they can see a cop that means the money is going to something tangible that a politician can point to and say we did all of these numbers because cops. While firefighters the more money you put in, it doesn’t as easily translate to a figure that you can point to and say we did all this fire stuff. Which then the general populous gets pissed off that their tax dollars are being wasted.

        It doesn’t make it right, smart, sensible or logical. But the general population doesn’t really care about that.

  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Is this true? Lots of disinformation flying around about the fire dept in LA. I haven’t gotten around to fact checking for myself.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The immediate narrative of “they cut the budget” is not quite true. The budget was done while the city was negotiating with the main union, so they didn’t have exact numbers for additional wages and benefits, and the normal process is to leave them off entirely until the contract is done. That showed cuts on paper. They then finished the deal and ended up with a 6.5% total increase.

      HOWEVER, the broader point is that while the LAPD budget is being augmented to bring on hundreds of new officers and hire civilian support positions, the Fire department’s budget is stagnating, and the budget specifically eliminated 79 civilian support positions and lowered the overtime budget for firefighters. The chief pointed out it’s about the same size as it was 50 years ago. So, she basically took the media moment to get some attention on the need for more resources, and it turned out she was very right.

      The overal LAFD budget after the restored funds is around $895M. For comparison, the police budget got a 7.5% increase in city funding, and its ~$2B city budget is augmented by state and federal funds for about another ~$1.2B. I’m sure the fire department gets something, particularly when a massive emergency actually happens, but I couldn’t find any readily available numbers for any ongoing support from state or federal.

      And just for “funsies,” when Fox News reported on the FD cuts, they compared not to police, but to the city “spending millions on the homeless,” which while true, also reflected a full 26% cut from $250M to $185M. Never change, Fox News. /s

    • Poxlox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      Ignore the other guy. It’s true. The fire chief pointed out several infrastructure deficiencies, meanwhile the Mayor cut the fire budget by over $17 million and raised the police budget.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Yep, see -

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-wildfires-los-angeles-fire-chief-budget-cuts/ (archived at https://archive.is/a4IxG)

        https://theintercept.com/2025/01/08/la-police-budget-palisades-fires/ (archived at https://archive.is/a4IxG)

        e; also, this -

        … the budget picture is far from rosy. Chief Kristin M. Crowley of the Los Angeles Fire Department wrote a memo to the fire commission last month saying the overtime cut was creating “unprecedented operational challenges” — both in fulfilling everyday tasks like payroll processing and long-term planning for major emergencies like big wildfires or earthquakes.

        She wrote that specialized programs, including air operations and disaster response, relied on staff working overtime hours and were at risk of becoming less effective. She added that the loss of civilian positions was also squeezing firefighters who had to backfill some of those responsibilities.

        In November, Chief Crowley wrote a separate memo to the commission focusing on the bigger picture: a fire department that has not changed much in size since the 1960s despite the city’s population surging by more than a million people since then.

        She wrote that the call volume rose by a factor of five between 1969 and 2023, but that the department had not been given the staffing and new fire stations it needs to respond effectively, and that response times were steadily increasing.

        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/09/us/la-fire-department-budget-bass.html (archived at https://archive.is/xBCxj)

        • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          People are using the same NYT article to support both sides of this argument.

          I’m not an NYT subscriber. What’s the deal here?

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 days ago

          When the two sides did reach an agreement in November, that money was moved over to the fire department’s pot, according to Mr. Blumenfield’s office, meaning this year’s fire budget is actually $53 million more than last year.

          Weird way to cut a budget

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 days ago

            How long was it before the budget got reallocated? And how much had this been going on before?

            It sounds like a big part of the issue is that they haven’t been able to do mitigation - controlled burns, etc. If the budget has been slashed for a long time, suddenly dumping some cash in later is going to have a limited effect.

    • morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’ve heard the fire dept bill was passed separately, so if you just look at the normal spending bill, it will look like a cut.

      Like if you upgrade to a new computer, observe that your old computer is gone, and conclude that you don’t have a computer and liberals must have stolen it, and get off my lawn while you’re at it

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      15 days ago

      No. Even if it was, this isn’t a thing you can beat by throwing bodies or money at. It was just too fast.

      The argument I would allow is if that money had been spent by the world over the last 40 years to prevent climate change.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        Fire mitigation is the issue, reducing its potential effects before it occurs since preventing it entirely is basically impossible. Without the budget, that stuff doesn’t happen, and that’s what leads to faster-spreading wildfires.

  • BatrickPateman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I see potential for a self fulfilling prophecy here:

    Instead of putting funding into things that keep people from revolting put it in prepping “law” enforcement for they day they inevitably will.

    (Autocorrect suggested flaw instead of law. Kinda works too, doesn’t it?)

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    What’s funny is that the NAZIs also prioritized the police over their fire departments hierarchically. Of course they did that so that when synagogues were burned down the cops could stop the fire departments from putting out the fire.

    This is a whole new level of NAZI.

    • constnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      And the OP post is another form of propaganda and misinformation. The fires started in LA county a place the mayor has no control over. They have since then moved into the city of LA. Also, the LA fire department had a surplus of 20 million, so they took 17 million of that surplus and put it elsewhere. It wasn’t dedunded at all.

      The police force did get an increase in funding and that should be discussed. They are basically a gang and didn’t need that extra funding and should be defunded but the fire department didn’t get funding pulled.

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        This is absolutely syncing right up with MAGA misinformation. I heard today that the 17 million was for a special purchase in the previous budget and wasn’t part of the regular fire department budget. Also, the racists and sexists are decrying DEI, apparently because the chief is a woman. Police funding and what it supports is a separate issue, as you point out.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          I think there’s a fence, the fire can’t climb over the fence so it gets stuck.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      One time, I was on a car trip with a friend and we passed a yard sign advocating funding (or maybe supporting? It was a long time ago) the fire department. I said “who doesn’t support the fire department?” and she responded “I don’t know … Arsonists?”

      So yeah, arsonists might want to see the fire department defunded.

  • Luffy879@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Funnily, thats the exact plot of the Show im currently watching

  • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Let’s completely ignore climate change as the root cause of more severe and frequent fires.

    This planet is going to implode and these idiots who are blaming a single mayor are going to drag us with them.

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Turns out the firefighters where actually starting the previous fires to legitimize their need for a higher budget.

    Good job Mayor!

    At least the police can be trusted to follow the laws they enforce. The chief promised this himself.