• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 2nd, 2025

help-circle





  • From the DNC’s perspective, going left lost against Nixon of all people, during a deeply unpopular war. Going left was crushed by Regan. Both Bush presidents won by attacking centrist candidates from the right. Clinton ran very centrist campaigns and won. Obama was at best more practical than ideological. Carter and Biden picked up the pieces of disasters, but that didn’t translate in to long term gains, and neither of them got credit for what wins they delivered the left.

    I agree the DNC should go left, but I understand it’s hard to make the case based on the last 60 years of experience.


  • I too grew up in an era of action movies, where the good guy decisively self-defenses the bad guy to death, saves the world, goes home and has marital relations with the prom queen. It’s a powerful story, but ultimately it’s just a story.

    Peaceful resistance does work, but there isn’t a single event that achieves change. It has to be an accumulation.

    Rosa Park’s arrest didn’t achieve anything “in terms of change”.

    Ghandi’s protest fasts didn’t achieve anything “in terms of change”.

    When the Baltics had their singing revolutions, there wasn’t a single performance that achieved anything “in terms of change”.

    All these were parts of larger efforts of peaceful resistance that culminated in change.

    What did Cory Booker’s speech achieve? It’s too early to say. It’s possible it will be part of an accumulation that culminates in measurable results. On the other hand, it’s possible cynicism will poison the resistance and it will achieve nothing. We’ll only know once the history is written.



  • BalderSiontomemes@lemmy.worldZoomers & Boomers are the same
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    There was a period where it was still a skill to know how to use a computer. If you had a computer in your house it was a part of your identity, you were a computer owner. Using a computer was something you did. The computer is a powerful tool, and the user had an opportunity to overcome the challenge of learning how to use it.

    Now a computer is an appliance. People know how to do what they do with it, but see no reason to explore farther. They aren’t interested in delving into the device’s potential. Owning a computer is like owning a car. They want it for the function they use it for. Learning more is like learning to change the oil in a car. In principle easy, but more of a chore than an opportunity.


  • BalderSiontomemes@lemmy.worldZoomers & Boomers are the same
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    I remember watching an interview with the CEO of SUN microsystems in the 90’s argue that you didn’t need to know how to run a nuclear power plant to use a light switch, and you shouldn’t have to know how a computer works to use one.

    I guess his vision came true, and we’re mad about it?



  • Ok, so sure, a reasonably large chunk of all states education budget is going away, but for the states that do well, the hole will both be a smaller portion of the overall budget, and easier to make up.

    No child left behind testing goes away, so the testing and standards all go away. You can bet the bottom 25 states in education ranking will quietly stop testing and claim they’re doing just great!

    It’s the special Ed programs that are really going to catch hell. No dept. of Ed. no enforcement of standards. It will be the easiest portion to cut to save money, and the families left in the lurch will get nothing but thoughts and prayers to fill the gap.


  • BalderSiontoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldTwo-bit Conman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Don’t believe Trump lives in a world where “truth” and “lie” has no meaning. He doesn’t lie to deceive. If that was his goal his lies would be more carefully crafted. He lies as a demonstration of power and test of obedience. He is absolutely saying things that no one believes are true, just to make his toadies nod along, just to ensure no one yet feels brave enough to question his pronouncements.

    If none are willing to contradict his statements, none will hesitate to carry out his orders.


  • This is the sort of thing that makes me feel more sympathy for the Democratic party. The party simply can’t win with the left.

    The party leadership worked against Sanders candidacy because they are convinced a liberal can’t win in America. I don’t agree, but recognize with Nixon and Reagan dominating over leftist candidates, Carter ekeing out a win as a centrist, Clinton winning convincingly as a centrist, and Obama winning as a rather vague candidate, recent history has given limited reason think a leftist national candidate is a safe bet.

    But if voters are supporting Cuomo and the party doesn’t intervene the party is the wrong for not ignoring the will of the voters and tanking his candidacy.

    I mean I get it. The left wants their candidates to win, but the lack of consistency is grating. It makes the centrist seem more sensible.





  • For me this changes all the time as I invest in developing something, and inevitably something catches my attention. I’m pretty invested in the Open D6 system, so I’m always riffing on this system.

    Lately I’ve been penciling out a game where a party is rewarded with the Charter to the king’s casino. I started with the idea of inverting Ocean’s 11, since every party ever wants to rob a casino as soon as they learn there is a casino. So, the idea is the party has control of a casino and now they have to deal with organized crime, card counters and sharps, rivals, labor disputes, royal demands, and the occasional party that thinks they’ve got a surefire plan for an epic heist.