• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    How would you determine when people are allowed to drink, own a firearms, sign contracts, drive…?

    • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly? We can debate each separately. We don’t need a single magic number that we try to apply to all circumstances.

      I don’t object to the specific number, I object to making it match a different number as the reason.

      Heck, there are probably a lot of 16 year olds that are mature enough to responsibly handle a firearm, that doesn’t mean we should change all the age requirements for everything to 16 either.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you in favor a system where tests are administered to verify that people are competent enough to do adult things or do you think different ages for different things is appropriate?

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think it depends on the thing. I don’t want us to say anyone can fly a plane without a license just because they are old enough and I also think that a some kind of test to see if someone is responsible enough to drink would be stupid when age is good enough for that.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            A pilots license and drivers license both have age and competency requirements. However anyone can fly an ultralight at any age.

            How about liability? Signing contracts? Voting?