So why does it only come with 40.5 million plastic bux if the title of the set is 4.05 billion
Those are $100 bills
Because each is worth $100
Zoom in on the plastic buck.
Can you imagine what a Star Trek film will look like with that kind of money?
I don’t know, but I hope they still go with practical effects.
If there were no billionaires, maybe we could live in star trek like society, in a world beyond neoliberality.
Could I get a tea, Earl Grey, hot, whenever I wanted?
Be careful what you wish for…
If you live on a class M planet in the United Federation of Planets and have access to a replicator… Then, yes.
Just don’t live on a homeworld, those have… troubles.
Not to be that guy but this is no way to build Lego. There are no connections.
There is no better right than technically right 👍
Lol love it
George Lucas has no connections to his fans, so it works
I really appreciate these attempts to help visualize fabulous sums of money. It reminds me of https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/
This reminds me of my giant turd analogy.
Basically, there is this giant turd, its enormous, biggest thing you’ve ever seen Everyone is fighting and climbing over each other to touch thia turd. The more of your body that touches the turd the more you own.
At the bottom, people are barely getting a tip of their finger through the crowds to touch the turd, some cant touch it at all. They are poor or homeless.
As you move up the turd there are people with a whole hand on the turd, they are coping, they get by, pretty average amount of turd to be touching.
Some people have two hands on the turd and they do pretty well, quite well off.
Then theres those who are whole bodies in the turd, they are rolling in it, they have some put away that others can’t touch. They are set for life.
But then, you look up, and its jeff bezos, elon musk et al. Sitting on the rim of a giant toilet seat in the sky all taking a massive dump…
Its a shit analogy but its accurate.
I guess it would be more concise to say the mega rich are eating chicken whilst the rest of us fight for the scraps that fall off the table.
Horse and sparrow economics is what they used to call trickle down. The more I learn about “economics,” the more it looks like they are just lying to themselves ever since Keynes, so they can continue to be horrible people until we slap the shit out of them, and make them change.
Wow that’s disgusting
I’ve been thinking: if we’re a nice kind of government, couldn’t we just print the money we’re going to use to for example, give americans in poverty 10000$ ? This would “just devalue the money the rich people have”, so something about international exchange rates is propably the thing that stops me from mentally circumventing the freedom-based value that we can’t just take money people have earned. really gross food for thought
The biggest problem with that is that rich people don’t actually have massive piles of cash, they have massive piles of stocks. Devalue the currency, and their stocks are worth a lot more actual cash
Think of it like a ratio. It devalues the savings of every day people more significantly than it devalues the massive piles rich people have. Rich people have this insane buffer and always have the means to play the rigged system to their favour and win.
Well actually…
Thanks for this. Something about having to scroll, and it being zoomed in to almost everyday scale makes this hit so much harder than graphs with a tiny dot next to the wealth of the billionaires.
It’s insanity.
So to put this in perspective, at an average cost of 10 cents per LEGO this set would cost over 4 million dollars.
At the current brick market rate the 2×1 100$ Money Tile only goes for $0.01 so it would cost around $450,000. And the only known prototype George Lucas lego figure last sold for in the ballpark of $50k;
so grand total to achieve this build is ~$500k
True, but you’d get a discount if you hand selected all the needed peices with any set though. The 10 cent estimate is for official sets, so if Lego released this set we could expect they’d price it at around $4 million
Kinda crazy how one layer of that is more money than most people will ever have available at any given time, and he has over 25,000 layers
“Kinda”?
It’s insane.
I think millionaires are fine, but billionaires are excessively rich. If literally everything in society was fine than maybe, sure, but until then…
If everything in society was fine, I’m pretty sure becoming a billionaire would be actually impossible.
Not to be THAT guy, but the instructions say 1x Forty Million Five-Hundred Thousand
Represented numerically, 4 billion looks like:
4 000 000 000.00
I think they are $100 bills. So the math should work out
https://www.housingfinance.com/news/george-lucas-proposes-affordable-housing_o
Tried to get affordable housing built, that’s pretty cool.
I calculated it, this looks like 32 x 48 blocks, so a total volume of roughly 15.6 m³. Considering that they’re going to be loose in the box and not perfectly stacked, I’d double that volume. This would result in a box set, if it were a cube, with ~3m sides. The weight would be 10.53 tons.
Love this! Now calculate how much oil is in it such that exactly one USA would invade
Yeah but what bulk density are you using?
What do you mean bulk density?
The dollar bills have a slight hollow indent, so you can’t just model them as a solid prism of ABS. I assume is the question here. You might be off by about 15%
The part pictured here seems to be 3069px7 with the base color incorrectly set to white. In any case, it’s 3069, the standard 1x2 tile. Thanks to the folks at LDraw who have modeled every Lego brick in detail (because of course people have done that), we get a volume of 303.8mm³, with a bounding box size of 408.6mm³, for a density of about 74%. But, Bricklink can just directly tell us the mass of a 1x2 tile is 0.26g, so the total mass is 10.5 metric tons.
That’s exactly the weight value I used in my original calculation :)
Of course someone has just published a table with all know masses of all lego pieces ever
I used the weight value on bricklink.com which I assume is correct :)