• ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      That should be obvious based on the fact that they only respond to crimes that have already occurred. By their own nature, they’re completely reactionary.

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah none of those guns were actually “in the school” because thin blue line means cops cowards above anyone else. They won’t risk their lives for you.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The Supreme Court ruled like a decade ago that cops DO NOT have a constitutional right to protect you. A cop can literally watch you get stabbed to death in the streets, and they are not obligated to help or stop it. Let that sink in.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        NOT have a constitutional right to protect you.

        Duty* actually. They can if they want but they don’t have to.

        Small, yet big, difference.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    No, it doesn’t prove that guns in school won’t solve the problem.

    It proves you can’t trust cops to do the bare fucking minimum.

    If teachers had been armed? It might–might–have ended sooner with fewer innocent victims. At least the teachers had some skin in the game, and teachers usually care about the kids in schools.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          How about “Less guns in the hands of those who should not have them in the first place”, like every other civilized country does? And guess what, those countries know “school shootings” only as something America does.

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          My solution is making gun ownership less indiscriminate. In my country, I’d have to prove that I need a gun for self-defense and pass a psychological and physical check. Moreover, the license would have to be renewed after 5 years.

          • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            The problem is that in the US, the guns are already in the hands of everyone. There are more guns than people. The cat’s out of the box.

            • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              Buyback programs. Ammo purchasing restrictions. Laws requiring documentation of all firearms with strict penalties for undocumented weapons. There are proven menthods of de-escalating and de-weaponizing populations when they are provided with the means, motive and opportunity.

              Get out of here with this defeatist attitude. You’d never make this argument for driving a vehicle without a license because “tHeRe ArE tOo MaNy CaRs”

              • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                Buyback programs in the US are good for PR but do little to remove guns that would be used in a crime. Mostly people sell their junk and old rifles at these things. Many times, while they’re waiting in line they’ll get a better offer by the mob of people on the sidewalks looking to buy.

                Ammo restrictions, I agree would be effective. But the 2nd Amendment would shut that down.

                Documented firearms, again the cat is out of the bag. There are millions of undocumented firearms in the US. And no criminal would use one with a paper trail anyway. This just makes things harder for honest people.

                Those “proven” methods haven’t worked in the US. The 2nd Amendment and a very armed population will see to it that the guns are here to stay, by force if necessary.

                I’m not a defeatist, I’m a realist.

                • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Each of these ideas solves a different aspect of the bigger problem, but none of them will solve the entire issue.

                  The problem is that with these ‘realistic’ views, we never make ANY progress by just throwing our hands up, saying ‘Well there are just too many guns to solve the problem with a single solution.’

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I have a friend that used to be a stripper (“exotic dancer”, if you prefer). She tried to get a concealed carry permit–in Detroit–long before Heller v. D.C. and McDonald v. Chicago because she had a stalker. She was denied, because she didn’t have any greater need for self-defense than any other person.

            Who defines psychological wellness? For reference, I’m a gun owner, and I compete in shooting matches on a regular basis. About a decade ago, I failed to complete suicide; I attempted suicide because I was being seriously abused (verbally, mentally, emotionally, financially, and sometimes physically) by my ex-spouse, which had lead to serious isolation and depression. I believe that I am mentally healthy now–as did my last psychiatrist–but I am forever barred from owning a firearm in Illinois because I was held for observation at a hospital in the state. Moreover, people with serious mental illnesses are more likely to be victims orf violence rather then perpetrators.

            Why should people that are less physically capable be less able to defend themselves?

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            You can’t “prove you need a gun for self defense” until it’s too late. Unless you mean “only of you’re rich, important, and white (this is America mind you) enough that we think there’s a chance those dirty not-white races may attack you.”

            Personally I don’t think we should limit guns to the wealthy elite, I think that even us lowly poors deserve the right to protect our lives.

            • 100_kg_90_de_belin @feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              I’ve never even thought, “I need a gun” and I’m not rich or wealthy or affluent. The only reason I’ll ever learn to handle firearms is to shoot fascists if the need arises.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                Damn fine reason. Unfortunately not everyone is as lucky as you in not needing one before then, too. I wish they were, but unfirtunately there are still people who want to victimize others. Less than there used to be though, crime has gone down since '93, so that’s a positive!

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m not a native English speaker, but should it be called “anniversary”? I thought it’s only for something to be celebrate?

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This tradegy and the handling of it makes me so fucking mad. I feel so unreasonably pissed this is part of the world we created.

    I wish I had an outlet.

  • fender_symphonic584@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Sounds like the guns weren’t in the schools. They were out. Your implying that had they been in the school, we wouldn’t have had the same level of tragedy.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Final proof that more guns in our schools will not keep our kids safe.

    What does the issue of the inaction of law enforcement have to do with the idea of “guns in our schools” (presumably this is inferring armed security or arming other school staff)? I am of the opinion that a lot of these issues could be solved adding armed security to schools. There are quite a number of sensitive locations like that which would benefit from that sort of security, imo.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    What’s the point of all that military gear they’re wasting tax payer money on then? Fascist cosplay?

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Arm ALL THE PREGNANT MOTHERS! If you Preggnant You Get a FREE FIREARM WITH UNLIMITED BULLETS !

          :-D

      • lemonsqueeze@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        That makes sense. Those protesters are scary and can hurt a police officer’s feelings. Its protester <-> police.

        Where a school, there’s so many little kid bodies that can take bullets to protect our blue heroes.

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Why does female anatomy always get used as an insult? It’s a prime example of toxic masculinity and patriarchy that non-male genitalia are so reviled as to be an insult against others.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          it’s only an insult to people who think dick size = status. try telling someone who’s butthurt about being called a pussy that it’s not an insult lol

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          You use whatever is gonna make the target mad as an insult. It’s why bad mouth little kids will go after your mom or say removed in comms. It’s the low hanging fruit. They don’t care about your mom and they’re not likely to be racist either. It’s about attention.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Because they’re the type who think they’re alpha males, and that particular insult is incredibly insulting to them.

      • Saurok@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        They’re talking about the yellow square next to Chris Murphy’s username on X in the picture. I have no clue what it stands for either.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Holy shit, I thought it was double digits. How did they get 376 to show up without any of them roid raging their way into doing something other than dicking around?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      How did they get 376 to show up without any of them roid raging their way into doing something other than dicking around?

      Some of them tried and were actively prevented from doing it by other Officers. The whole situation is actually worse than most people realize.

        • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          From one report, they didn’t know who was in charge because there were State and local units. So they did nothing while some in charge waited to hear who should be giving the orders. At least that’s how I remember it.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Right because that can all be excused away with “policy issues” that leave nobody actually accountable and spits in the face of common sense. “I didn’t try to take down the shooter because I didn’t have anyone to tell me that’s why we were there in the first place”

            • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              You’re talking about people who worship authority. Critical thinkers and independent personalities are not welcomed or tolerated in law enforcement or the military. These people literally need to be told what to think, and what to do.

            • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              I’m not saying that it was a good excuse, just that it was used.

              IIRC, they even had a shooter drill prior to the massacre, but that obviously didn’t help.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            The fucking litter boxes. Was that meme planted so we could identify which of our friends and neighbors went off the deep end?

            • makuus@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              I’m no conspiracist, but… If I were a malicious—perhaps foreign—power and I saw how well that kind of fake news spread and how much staying power it had, despite it being totally far-fetched, and yet easily-verifiable, I’d be absolutely fucking giddy.

              It would be the surest sign that I could now spread any bit of disinformation, particularly anything not easily-verifiable, and absolutely tear the country apart.

            • SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              It seriously stresses me out how many people in my community have taken that seriously. In my own family, even. It is indeed one of the many possible indications of someone to whom I don’t want to give my time.

            • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              It really speaks to the issue of how many people get their news: secondhand from their family members who read a story (or listened to fox “news”), misunderstood some of it, then injected further biases while getting some of the facts wrong (purposefully or accidentally).

    • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Because it’s a group of narcissists. They were too worried about themselves. None of them had the courage to say “I’m willing to not go home tonight so these kids can.”

      Actually I’d bet that a bunch said that, but didn’t actually do anything about it.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        This is what pisses me off the most. 376, and you can’t storm the room? 376? And you refuse to trade one for any of those children who needed protecting? These are supposedly the hard calculations they have to make and they all unilaterally chose themselves? Enforcers will always be useless to anybody but the property owners. They aren’t actually here to protect anybody. They should have made the call, and traded 20 of themselves so those kids didn’t have to die. Thats the hard call we expect these “hard asses” to make.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          I can’t remember the study but basically the bystander effect is a thing. The more people there are in a group, the more likely it is that no one will do anything because everyone will assume that someone else will do something.

          This isn’t to excuse officers because they are specifically trained that they are that someone. The fact that they were held back from entering is willful, malicious, and negligent.

          The fact that the officers actually complied instead of disobeying orders especially when seconds turned to minutes, is cowardice.

          And a reminder that I believe the police chief and mayor of the town was reelected by the town.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I scoff every time a cop on a TV show is like “I joined the force to save lives and make a difference” because it’s painfully obvious that this is pretty much never the case in reality.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Yeah but it doesn’t sound as good like, “I joined the force to get away with beating my wife after pissing my Punisher logo boxers at work.”

    • Blackout@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      They joined the force because it has the best job security next to CEOs in the US.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        I feel like CEOs are more like football coaches in terms of job security. As long as they keep winning, just about no form of misconduct can dislodge them. Stop winning though, and the hot seat can become very uncomfortable.

        • flerp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          But they make so much money and get huge golden parachutes so they have more money than they would need for the rest of their lives, and yet they still are able to get other CEO jobs. It’s a little club and once you’re in, you’re in.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      They didn’t specify “which lives” or “what differences”. We can make some guesses, but I don’t think we’d like their answers.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      Nothing changed because Uvalde immediately re-elected the same republiQan slate that put them there. After that tragedy. There’s should be no more question that it’s a cult.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Uvalde immediately re-elected the same republiQan slate that put them there

        Sadly, the kids weren’t allowed to vote. Mature enough to get shot at. Not mature enough to select the police who stand idle while it happens.

        • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Not yet, so the clock is ticking for Republicans to make government of the people, for the people, by the people perish from the earth.