Did I say mandatory? I meant optional! You’re “free” to die in a cardboard box under a freeway as a market capitalist scarecrow warning to the other ants so they keep showing up to make us more!

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t agree with unrealized gains taxes in general, but the instant they are used as collateral, or if value in any way is extracted from them (even loan value), they become realized gains, and should be taxed.

    What you’re suggesting would also mean you’re advocating for middle class homeowners to be taxed on a full value of a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) even if they haven’t spent a dime of it yet. Was that your intention?

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I believe you’re referring to rules on sale of a home where there is a capital gain, meaning you bought the house for $100k and sell it for $350k, no cap gains taxes. We’re in uncharted waters with what @[email protected] is proposing. That user (possibly) suggesting it for HELOCs too.

        • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Okay but you can just apply the same logic to a HELOC. If you get a 30k HELOC for a bedroom renovation then it does not count towards capital gains tax.

          Even normal capital gains taxes have brackets.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Okay but you can just apply the same logic to a HELOC. If you get a 30k HELOC for a bedroom renovation then it does not count towards capital gains tax.

            Wouldn’t this be a double standard if we’re applying @[email protected] 's logic? The rich would get taxed on loaned money but the middle class wouldn’t?

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              that’s like the point of the entire system? I mean, I don’t want to go back to the 1800s corporate baronies that defined most industry at that point in time

            • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s generally how progressive tax brackets work, yes. Technically speaking if I rich person wants to take out a 30k HELOC they’d also not get taxed on it.

            • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              This is how… EVERYTHING works… Income tax brackets, 401k limits. I thought this was pretty obvious, from each according their ability and all.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh no, I guess our legislators’ hands are tied. It’s not like they could just put an exemption for a person’s first home into the law or anything.

      Oh well.

    • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They didn’t set out their whole tax platform for their presidential bid friend. We can trivially blow down your straw man with a primary residence exemption or, you know, tax brackets.