On Thursday, some links to the notorious shadow library Library Genesis (Libgen) couldn’t be reached after a US district court judge, Colleen McMahon, ordered what TorrentFreak called “one of the broadest anti-piracy injunctions” ever issued by a US court.

In her order, McMahon sided with textbook publishers who accused Libgen of willful copyright infringement after Libgen completely ignored their complaint.

To compensate rightsholders, McMahon ordered Libgen to pay $30 million, but because nobody knows who runs the shadow library, it seems unlikely that publishers will be paid any time soon, if ever.

    • GCanuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sure. But the folks who put the knowledge in a digestible format should be rewarded for their efforts.

      • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d happily pay $20-40ish for a quality textbook. I have many times before. It’s when they want to charge $300 and give almost nothing to the authors that I have a problem with. Extra scummy when they make a new edition that’s just barely different enough you can’t use it for class because the practice problems don’t match or give you one time use online codes that render it worthless for resale.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I would ask if you’re fine with books becoming subscription based commodities.

        I would hope your answer is no.

        We both know you don’t read past the headlines though, so your opinion on this matter is as limited as your understanding of the topic.

        I agree, creators should be paid, but libraries should be a protected branch of society. one day when capitalism forces a subscription pattern to books and locks knowledge behind paywalls, those libraries will be the only salvation for the disenfranchised masses.

        • buzz86us@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Only if it is like $20 a month and encompasses all of your textbooks, but that will never happen

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        unless you have a product that needs to feed off someone else’s labour to be somewhat useful, then you can use it for free legally without compensating anyonee

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The index is distributed. The files are hosted in multiple places. Historically, some of the storage spots have been compromised web servers. There are copies in ipfs.

      I get the feeling it’s maintained by a collective. No idea how they coordinate content acquisition or update indexes. It’s pretty well updated.

    • Bonifratz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Libgen and scihub have done more for science than any of those shitty journal publishers.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I cannot count the times that I have gone through the legitimate path to read a paper, by clicking “AcCeS tHiS pApEr ThRoUgH yOuR iNsTItUtIoN” and I log in through my university, faffing with 2FA, only to be told “nah, you don’t have access”. I just go straight to scihub nowadays.

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Hell, a lot of the time I just go directly to Sci-Hub / Anna’s Archive because it’s literally faster than searching for my university and logging in.