Josseli Barnica grieved the news as she lay in a Houston hospital bed on Sept. 3, 2021: The sibling she’d dreamt of giving her daughter would not survive this pregnancy.

The fetus was on the verge of coming out, its head pressed against her dilated cervix; she was 17 weeks pregnant and a miscarriage was “in progress,” doctors noted in hospital records. At that point, they should have offered to speed up the delivery or empty her uterus to stave off a deadly infection, more than a dozen medical experts told ProPublica.

But when Barnica’s husband rushed to her side from his job on a construction site, she relayed what she said the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat,” he told ProPublica in Spanish. “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.”

For 40 hours, the anguished 28-year-old mother prayed for doctors to help her get home to her daughter; all the while, her uterus remained exposed to bacteria.

Three days after she delivered, Barnica died of an infection.

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is worse than ‘Thoughts and Prayers’.

    A lot of elected officials - and their supporters - are accessories to the killing .

    This is more like armed police waiting around outside a crime scene and actively preventing any attemp . . .

  • rez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What the actual fuck. This is horrendous.

    Pro-life crowd, I thought you were supposed to keep life, not end it.

    Now there’s a man who’s a widow, and a child without a mother, and a lady who died for literally nothing.

    Fuckin’ hell.

  • Shou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So the medical professionals listened to a man, rather than the woman? Typical. Men shouldn’t have any say in women’s health. It’s in the nature of males to seek control over female reproduction. If people can’t filter this bias, we need a law to protect people against it.

  • neomachino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I see stories like this a lot and can’t believe it. My wife was in a similar situation and had to get an emergency dnc, and still came close to dying from sepsis.

    The doctors were so on it, we waited in the ER for a while because they were packed but as soon as they took her blood and realized what was going on she was in surgery within the hour.

    Our son want even 2 at the time. If we were 30 minutes west she would’ve died. It’s absolutely fucking wild.

    How could anyone think this is right?

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Pro lifers kill again. They rate the right to live of potential life higher than someone who has been here for 28 years. Someone who left a husband and a child behind. I have to accept I hate pro lifers for the harm they cause. There is no justice in this world as long as these inhuman and barbaric laws are killing people. Real people, not potential people.

  • davidagain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Vote Kamala Harris and your sisters, wives and daughters might stop dying for lack of health care when pregnant. Allow Trump to regain power and it will get much, much worse for the women you care about.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What is the course of action that you expect Kamala to take that would prevent this situation in Texas? And if you have one, why hasn’t Biden done it already?

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Not actively, gleefully making things worse. Biden is doing this.

        Working to stack the Supreme Court, and triggering a constitutional crisis in the process because the Republican Senate will refuse confirmation, and the Supreme Court that was stacked with self-contradictory GOP bullshit will agree with them would be the interesting move that won’t happen because the Democrats are cowards and institutionalists rather than fascist monsters.

      • sour@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What definitely will happen with Kamala is that women in New York or California don’t suffer the same fate next year as well.

      • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Win the WH, win both houses of Congress, blow up the filibuster and enact national protections for abortion.

        Will it work? Probably not. It definitely won’t happen if Trump wins, though.

        Plus if Trump wins, Alito and Thomas retire and get replaced by 25 year old fascists and things get even worse for decades.

        I dunno if you were being sincere or intentionally obtuse, but it’s kind of straightforward that we have to win.

        • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I am not American, nor the person you responded to, but in 2020 the Democrats won the white house, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.

          As an outsider looking in, why is there the expectation that Kamala doing it again in 2024 will have a different result?

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Unfortunately the Democrats need slightly more than a bare majority because some Democrats might as well be Republicans.

            Kamala has also stated her support for exempting this legislation from the filibuster, something Biden didn’t do. She wouldn’t technically have the power herself, but might get Senate Democrats on board.

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Back in 2020, I read op-eds from several pundits who worried that choosing Biden was a mistake, as he ran on a platform essentially of returning politics to “normal.” They worried that once he won, people would settle back into the old routines, and forget about the simmering fascist threat and do diddly about it. I remember this well, because I feared the same.

            That’s pretty much what happened. Credit to the House January 6th special committee for finally forcing Merrick Garland to get off his ass and do a something about the insurrection… 2 years later. (Which made it easy to delay the trial until after the next election.) That’s about it, though. Hell, this wasn’t difficult to predict, given the way that Obama decided to “look forward” and not hold Bush administration officials accountable for their crimes.

            That is to say, if Harris wins, I predict more of the same. Folks on the blue side will breathe a sigh of relief, make excuses for why they can’t act, and do their best to forget about it until the next most-important-election-in-history. We (Americans) don’t have a plan to deal with it, and they’ll instead just get angry and call you and me disingenuous, or Russian bots, for pointing it out.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          12 hours ago

          That shit hasn’t happened in less contentious times, I literally cannot imagine it happening now.

          • Yeller_king@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Ok probably not sincere.

            The contentiousness is what put killing the filibuster on the table. In less contentious times, we didn’t need to destroy basic political norms just to save people’s lives.

            It takes basically no effort to vote. Things are clearly better with Harris winning than Trump.

              • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                You arent sincere. You dont bring any arguments to the table while all the people you are arguing with did. Why do you think Trump would make this situation better when he is the reason this issue exists?

      • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Who controls the House? That’s a better barometer of change but having a supportive president is paramount. Either have control of the house and overwhelming control of the Senate, or enough control of both that a friendly President signs the bill into law.

        Why hasn’t Biden done it already? Mike Johnson.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Pro-lifers doing a fantastic job of killing people. Truly horrific.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A texas woman didn’t die, a texas woman was murdered by the state’s ignorant, bigoted, christo-fascist policy - abbott, patrick, cruz, gohmert, that cock eyed AG and the rest of them along with every complicit texas republican voter… they all have blood on their cowardly hands.

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Someone should go to prison for life over this. Jesus Christmas.

    If you can’t see how wrong this is, you are a broken person.

    • dessimbelackis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Anti-choice is gaining more traction and is more accurate. Anti-choice or pro-death is more appropriate and logically consistent

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    333
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    there’s another thread about outsiders’ criticisms of lemmy, and one of the comments mentioned that it’s “unwelcoming to right wing viewpoints”

    I WONDER FUCKING WHY

      • Coach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        87
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        1000%. So long as right-wing equates to racist, seditious, traitorous bastards, then yeah…you’re not welcome here or anywhere else in this country. Go find Jesus or something.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Any amount of right wing will never sit well with me after trump. Things could flip and the conservatives could somehow be fighting for workers rights and I’d still side with the party that supports women’s right to chose etc.

          If lemmy became a right wing cess pool I’d be done with it in a heart beat. There are a lot of shit ideas on this platform and I do wish I could find my tribe but as much as I know of them, they are my people.

        • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          yeah, definitions are hard, but in general I tend to think of the right as promoting traditional hierarchy and the left as being egalitarian.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Most right wingers think their views are legitimate because the right wing exists as the direct opposition to the left. But i think that view is warped.

        We need to start considering right wingers as extremists and not the opposition. They should be outliers on a spectrum where the left is much more central and the right is much more to the extreme right

        |----------------------------------------left wing----‐-----center----------------------------------------right wing--------|

        Like that

        They think their views are as right as ours are left. If they were, they would likely be welcome here.

        • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I don’t really see what is wrong with authentically egalitarian politics, so I’m inclined to think the “center” is just a euphemism for right-wing.

          If a left wing movement fails in its egalitarianism, like when the USSR had slave camps, then I think we should not think of that movement as left wing at all, it just fails the definition of being left wing.

          The common response to this is that it is a form of no true scotsman fallacy, which I think could be a legitimate concern since you might define a left wing ideal as the definition and anything failing to live up to the perfection of that ideal is not “left”. But on the other hand, I don’t know how else to consider some politics authentically egalitarian and worth supporting and others inauthentic or corrupt and embodying hierarchical or right-wing tendencies. Maybe there is no bright line we can draw or reduce to a logical equation, but I would like to think there is still some value in evaluating which politics to support (i.e. which politics are furthering egalitarian means or ends).

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Or, hear me out, discard the left-right metaphor for the nonsense that it is and refer to ideologies by their names. There is no left, there are communists/socialists and anarchists. There is no center, there are liberals and conservatives. There is no right, there are fascists and “libertarians.”

            The left-right metaphor is a set of training wheels, and by continuing to use them you sabotage your own political understanding.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I wish the world was unwelcoming to right-wing viewpoints. This is the result and so many people are fine with it. It’s so depressing.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Unfortunately you’ll have to get used to it and continue challenging them. The polycrisis is only going to get worse and the number of refugees from the impact of climate change and climate change related causes i.e. conflict from collapsing food / water access and / or failed states.

        In the next 10 to 20 years life quality will peak and then will start collapsing over the next 50.

        When that happens a significant cohort of the population will close ranks and want to “protect” those closest around them, the desire the ultra-rich have for isolation will continue to trickle down into the rich and remnants of the upper middle class as the wealth gap widens. In times of crisis this cohort pushes further and further right.

        So keep working against these forces so we can get the rich to pay their fair share to fix these problems but be prepared to take up arms when the house of cards that is the relative stability we have now collapses.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Right-wingers don’t have viewpoints. Fascism is not a legitimate political position. It is a threat. We don’t call a serial killer’s propensity to kill a “viewpoint”. Conservatives have motives, not viewpoints.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      21 hours ago

      > Talks against healthcare

      > Wonders why nobody likes those speeches

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Paradox of tolerance. They aren’t welcome because they tend not to play nice with others.

      I feel genuinely bad for the non-facist conservatives, but today they’d be called leftist too, so I think it’s still fair to say it really shouldn’t be welcome anywhere because the term has become very extreme.

      • TheOneCurly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        “non-fascist conservatives” have spent the last 40 years obstructing and cozying up to fascists rather than play well with others. They knew what they were doing.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Or, to be as charitable as possible, they’re useful idiots who are lazily unaware of how heinous the people they’re blindly following are.

          • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            They’re not exactly unaware, but only care for how it affects them. Anything heinous that happens to someone else is seen as completely irrelevant.

      • frunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This is how it works though, right? They keep ostracizing groups until they run out of out-groups to attack and the next round begins. The old inner circle is now the circle and a new inner circle is proclaimed, the new outgroup(s) are revealed, and the feeding frenzy continues.

        This is what always baffles me about minorities that are staunchly Republican. They’re actually voting for themselves to be put on the chopping block (just not right away)

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          21 hours ago

          This is exactly why fascism is ultimately self-defeating. The only question is how many people get hurt in the meantime.