You don’t even have to read this one wrong for it to be wrong.
So whoever designed this started left to right, decided up to down was better part way through, then switched back to left to right… All without ever proofreading their work apparently
How is it wrong? You intuitively read it correctly and are tripped up by the unusual letter placement. Pretty good design.
you intuitively read it correctly ? It took me three reads
I read it correctly and then did a double take. Seems like I Was the only one to Do that though.
it’s probably some high-level parsing,… I don’t have english as first language but perhaps in french I’d be prone to scan text like that, disregarding typos
Cause if a was a then man according to your logic
Except it was harder to read than if it stayed consistent the whole way through, and that lack of consistency serves to make this look more of a cheap, crappy knickknack than it already looks like
Yeah. This is a great one. It doesn’t scan no matter how you start.
3x⬆️ multiplier awarded
If a man be man, cause I was then. AMEN 🙏
…what’s a Then Man?
'Cause if I was a man, I’d be the man
For anyone struggling
You forgot the “then”. Should be “If I was a man, then I’d be the man”
