• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    TBH I’d be afraid of them learning anything with headlines telling them to blame Palestine supporters and Minorities.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The only “The Onion” rather than “Not The Onion” part of this is the idea that they would announce it.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I’d say “The Onion” part of this is that the democratic party doesn’t need to learn any lessons because it’s doing exactly what they want to do. The people who will refuse to learn from this are the people who still put faith in them and the democratic system in general.

      Sure democrats would prefer to win but the most important thing to them is making sure that policies to the left of the republican party are never a serious threat to the donors they both share. That’s pretty obvious at this point, right?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    56 minutes ago

    wouldnt matter if they did learn from it if the crap trump campaigned on goes through and he becomes a “king” in this country

  • m_f@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Local opinion piece:

    https://www.startribune.com/brehm-democrats-have-themselves-to-blame-for-trumps-election/601176736

    I read it because of the title, but it’s just some shithead that wants them to move further right:

    This red wave wasn’t as much about embracing Donald Trump as it was repudiating far-left progressivism.

    […], and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and unpalatable hard left alternative.

    They are already creating the groundwork for sucking more corporate dick.

    • J Lou@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How can this be a rejection of the far left when Harris campaigned as a moderate (e.g. Cheney)? If republican voters are going to think Democrats are communist regardless of how moderate the Democrats are, maybe moderating isn’t a good strategy. If the only choice is between right-wing and lite right-wing, right-wing voters will choose the real thing. Even then, Trumpists will still call democrats communists.

      Many left polices are popular when they aren’t labelled as left

      @theonion

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Reminds me of that joke about how there are only two races: White, and political. It’s disheartening to see folks (some here on Lemmy) confusing listening to the concerns of brown-skinned people with leftism. The Arab-Americans in Michigan, for a relevant example, are just people with a range of political opinions like the rest of us.

    • Loonesota@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hardly surprising coming from the Star Trib these days… I knew it was bad when they refused to even endorse a candidate.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oh they know how to win. They just don’t want to. The policy decisions that would lock in Dem control for generations to come run counter to the goals of DNC Services Corp. Because they’re a corp.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The funniest part of this is the idea that there will be an opposition party in anything but a token way after this.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Was there a party that did not install SCOTUS justices that were so ideologically conservative that they did things like end national legal abortion and gut the ability of government regulation agencies to regulate?

        Yes there was. But that party is not coming back except as a token now because people just didn’t think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to vote.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          But that party is not coming back except as a token now because people just didn’t think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to vote

          The party didn’t think stopping the rapist fascist dictator was a good enough reason to listen to their voters

          FTFY

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nope. They can’t force anyone to vote for them. People thought not voting was a better plan than stopping the rapist fascist dictator when they only had two possible choices.

            There was an absolute mountain of evidence that Trump would be a disaster. They didn’t vote anyway because they knew they weren’t going to get a pony.

            Voting for people in a two-party system is the stupidest thing you can do because you will never get your way with any one politician. So you vote against and keep voting against until you get closer and closer to what you want.

            Just not voting or voting for third party candidates that will clearly lose against someone who has an automatic 30% of the vote doesn’t stop the worst possible thing from happening and it never will.

            If you didn’t vote to stop Trump from getting into office, I blame you. You had warning after warning and your idealism was more important to you.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They can’t force anyone to vote for them.

              Yup, which is why you need to give them reason to vote.

              Democrats have been parading around “most important election of our lifetime” for fucking years - don’t be surprised that it didn’t work yet again.

              The reason why Trump is popular is because there is legitimate pain and struggle in the working class, and he affirmed that pain and struggle (even if he was misidentifying the source of that pain). Telling voters “things are good, actually, and the other guy is gonna ruin it” is just dumb.

              Democrats didn’t run on popular policy and they got destroyed because of it.

              • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Who said “things are good actually”?? Seems to me that Harris had plenty of policy proposals that would have resulted in a meaningful improvement to the bottom line of the average American.

                Biden has also been better for the average American than trump was. For fucks sake, Trump actually got away with raising taxes on all of us to support his tax cut for the rich, simply because the average person is too low information to grasp the idea of a tax cut that expires!

                So yeah, plenty of actual reasons to say that one candidate is better than the other, without needing to be wowed by an actual messiah who can dismantle our fucked up system and solve everybody’s problems.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They had a reason to vote.

                Their reason was that a rapist fascist who quoted Hitler and clearly has dementia that promised to deport millions of people and be a dictator on day one only had a 50/50 chance of being president.

                And they didn’t care because they didn’t like Kamala Harris much. Was she any of those things? No. But her boss is funding the same genocide in Israel that Trump said to Netanyahu “finish the job” about on national television, so no one better vote for her either!

                Sorry, not a good enough reason to not stop Trump. Not a good enough reason to refuse to vote. Not a good enough reason to vote third party.

                For fuck’s sake, do you think people voted for Joe Biden in 2020 because they thought he would be a terrific president?

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  do you think people voted for Joe Biden in 2020 because they thought he would be a terrific president?

                  they voted for Biden because he made meaningful concessions to the progressive caucus. He gave Bernie a prominent roll in his campaign and made promises about student loan forgiveness and raising the minimum wage, on top of affirming people’s anxiety about covid and a pledge to address it.

                  Harris had none of that. She didn’t primary against progressive candidates, didn’t have to address progressive concerns, and when there was vocal opposition to any of her policies she said “excuse me, i’m speaking”. She was more right-moderate than Biden was, even if only because she didn’t face the progressive primary he did.

  • vordalack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They ran Harris thinking she would win based on her demographics. The DNC needs to learn that not everyone wants a black/LGBTQ/woman/etc candidate that just runs on their race/gender/sexuality.

    They want someone that’s competent that will campaign on policies that will make their lives better. The DNC has moved so far away from the working class that the RNC, the party of wealthy creeps, has them.

    • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      They ran Harris because she was the only candidate they could justify shoehorning in without a primary, since she’s VP.

      Why they didn’t want to run a primary is a great question. Probably cost and time, and name recognition. Studies show that often the candidate with the most name recognition wins. There’s wasn’t enough time to tell every person in America a brand new person’s name.

      But usually VPs don’t do well when they run as president. Imo Dems are just trying to avoid another Bernie Sanders situation - a leftist with an authentic campaign and people who genuinely like them. More than anything, they gotta stop real progress in this country.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Imo Dems are just trying to avoid another Bernie Sanders situation - a leftist with an authentic campaign and people who genuinely like them

        100% this is why. They didn’t want any internal pressure for progressive policies or a public platform to voice them.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They lost the general because they refused to hold a legitimate primary. This wouldn’t of happened. They haven’t run a real primary since 2008 and look at how hard Obama won in a landslide after competing in a deep field of qualified and competent candidates.

    • LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They had no platform other than fear mongering about Trump.

      The difference between Harris and Obama was that while Obama was biracial that wasn’t the focus of his campaign, his platform was, and he articulated it well. That’s the real lesson to take away from Obama’s success at the polls not let’s run a black person and hope we win.

      • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Obama also competed against a deep field of qualified candidates in 2008. He went into the general with momentum of a popular mandate and then won in a landslide.

        He would of done nearly as good if he was a white man.

        On the flip side, when the republicans lost with Romney in 2012 they did a whole lot of soul searching (rather than blaming the electorate and moving closer to the center to court mythical ‘moderates’ which is the ongoing failed strategy of the democrats), and in 2016 they had an extremely competitive primary where trump came out on top with a mandate as popular with the base as Obama in 2008.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Primaries also benefit from the same effect that makes every movie and TV show a reboot: Name recognition. The long primary cycle keeps their name in the news so people get familiar with it so they’re more likely to vote for them.

    • keegomatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They ran Harris because she was the only viable option when it was clear that Biden was not. They did not run Harris thinking she would win at all, they ran her out of desperation because the incumbent was flatlining. It was not a choice, and it certainly was not one based on demographics. It was a “Hail Mary” and it failed as it was likely to do from the outset, and everyone who was paying attention knew that, yet had no choice but to hope for the best.

      • Rutty@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        48 minutes ago

        lol, you believe this? I don’t find it hard to believe that they put Biden though a primary, just to have him drop out…

        IMO running Harris was the plan from the beginning. You know, which was kind of the problem, hijacking the primary.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        So every racist and misogynist will say she did anyways.

        Including the ones on Lemmy.

        I think she, and to a greater extent the policies of the Democratic Party since Carter just cost America the Republic but there is literally nothing a black woman could do to convince some people she’s competent in her own right.

        Competent at neoliberal corporate cronyism, mind you. But Harris’s qualifications by herself are rock solid.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We also want to congratulate our friends in the Republican party, they played a great game and we can’t wait to work with them more.

    Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley is excited to see his colleagues at the DNC make the same mistakes over and over.

    This is amazing.

    “I saw how the DNC ignored voters, I saw how they talked down to people, and that just made my job easy. I go in and say ‘Democrats think you’re dumb, but Republicans think you’re a genius’ and these dopes eat it up like the slop they feed their pigs.

    Holy fuck is this even satire anymore? I can literally see a GOP campaign official say that in private.

    • iwndwyt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In private? I can see them saying it on TV and the rubes still voting for them since all they watch is Fox News and they’d never run it.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Exactly what is it they’re supposed to learn? I’m tired of this generic self-flagellation and blame game that says exactly the same thing every loss, but gets rounds of back slapping when the exact same tactics net a win.

    What is it exactly that should be done differently?

    The reason we lost is because people didn’t vote. Not because they voted for trump. So some apathetic MFs handed trump the win. We should ask them why they allowed that to happen.

    E: y’all downvoting a legit question and position? Pretty hypocritical to push aside someone asking a real question about change so the question doesn’t get seen. We want change, but we don’t want anyone to ask us what it should be?

    • harmsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      What is it exactly that should be done differently?

      The first thing that comes to mind is that Democratic politicians should remember who their core voting block is. They need to give up on the triangulation nonsense. Republicans already have their Anointed One and will never vote for a shoddy imitation, and that very act of imitation is driving away the progressive vote.

    • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The reason we lost is because people didn’t vote

      Do you think the dems should learn anything from this or should they do the same thing again next time and pray the apathetic people change on their own?

      If dems want to win they have to find a way to motivate those apathetic people instead of just telling them they are stupid.

      What dems should learn is that they need to offer something that clearly improves people’s lives. Universal healthcare or Medicare for all would be a great position to run on and 16 years ago I thought the dems were going to move in that direction but now it seems they’ve given up on the idea.

    • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      I feel like you answered your own question there: they should have run a better candidate. A more appropriate candidate, one who appeals more to the needs of those apathetic Americans, would naturally have resulted in higher turnout.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What is it exactly that should be done differently?

      Don’t campaign on maintaining the status quo when the status quo sucks

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      State level electoral reform will allow a bigger spectrum of political parties to represent those unengaged voters. It will also allow those voters to make the democrats their backup pick if their preference didn’t win.

      More people represented means more voters. More voters means more democratic votes. Why is the democratic party saying no to these easy votes?

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What I would like to know the most is why 14 million registered Democrats failed to vote in this election, especially given what is at stake. Because if it was for some stupid, single issue, then fark them, good and hard.

    • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      it’s because the dems tacked hard right to appeal to the mythical “moderate conservative” while telling everyone to the left of them to fuck off for months and months on end. people were shouting from the rooftops that this was going to cost them the election, and damn wouldn’t you know it, it looks like it did! will they learn from it? probably not!

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Why would they learn? They’ll be fine.

        This is what people don’t seem to understand. This is not some mythical “huge force.” Democrats elect their people through primaries and they rise. Same as ever.

        But all the people who don’t participate? YOU are the ones that have to suffer. Harris was a fine candidate. Sure she wasn’t Santa Claus on Christmas but she was fine and a million ways better than Trump. But people said “eh, I’m ok with Trump then” and didn’t vote for her.

        She isn’t gonna suffer. The DNC isn’t going to suffer. YOU and I are. This is what we call an “own goal.” And all the people wanting more left policy? Well good fucking luck when they stack the SCOTUS with 40 year old right wing fucks, stack the rest of the courts, and move everything back another 20 years progress-wise. Think you’re getting better healthcare soon? Think again. It got a ton harder now. Worried about the climate? Great! Because it was fucked before and it’ll be fucked a fuck more now. What little we were doing is going up in smoke.

        Besides that- two things can be right. The Dems need to refocus AND shithead lazy ass nonvoters need to get off the fucking couch and vote no matter what. Well, if they can still vote in a free and fair election in 2/4 years.

        • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          37 minutes ago

          Are you suggesting that if a voter doesn’t feel that either candidate will represent their needs, they should vote anyway?

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            They should be smart enough to vote for the one who gets closest to their needs. If they’re not a complete moron that is.

            The car is moving in one direction or another. It’d be smart to at least move it in the direction you think it should go.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The only other explanation is that those 14 million Democrats DID vote, but that their votes weren’t counted due to election day farkery. But I’m not ready to go down that rabbit hole without solid proof.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Democrats are ready and willing to do anything other then deliver the change Obama promised so many years ago.

          Only the most giga depresso life will do for our future generations

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s possible, but I doubt it.

          Occam’s Razor says people stayed home because the Democrats ran a shitty centrist who tried to appeal to the nonexistent ‘moderate Republican’. The Democrats have been doing that as long as I’ve been alive.

        • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I want them to do a recount. Here’s solid proof:

          Trump saying people don’t even need to go vote and he didn’t need their votes to win, Trump saying he had an election day secret with Johnson, the over 50 bomb threats, Elon Musk’s bullshittery with the lottery, the ballot boxes set on fire, the numerous people reporting issues with voting, previous election interference by Russia and Russia’s ongoing war, and tbh wouldn’t it be the perfect way to start a civil war in the US by Russia, by actually stealing the election this time and letting us know a week or two later?

          So let’s recount because our planet can’t survive 4 more years of drill baby drill. Let’s just do an audit of those machines and check it all out. If the audit is fine then fine. It’s the same courtesy he got.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            those things certainly did effect the total number of voters, but there’s no evidence that any of the votes for trump were fake, or that votes for harris were specifically not counted or destroyed (enough to effect a nationwide poor performance).

            Either there was a massive, nationwide conspiracy (for which there is no compelling evidence), or Harris simply didn’t perform well.

            • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I think she maybe didn’t perform well, sure. That can be true. But there’s enough evidence of issues includ8ng weird shit Trump himself said, that I think we should do an audit anyway just to make sure.

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                You’re getting into conspiracy theory here. Trump did better than expected everywhere. Blue states. Red States. Blue cities. Red cities. Didn’t matter. There was a shift almost everywhere. And this is across a nation that uses radically different voting machines, forms of voting, voting machine providers, etc. It doesn’t make sense that the could all be rigged so perfectly. It’s insanity.

                Yes, you can count “just in case,” but that way lies madness.

  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The reality is even worse. They’re going to “learn” all the wrong lessons. They will shift further to the right, like they always do.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      And this is one of the reasons why people shifted Republican in this last election.

      If the Democratic party won’t represent Democratic ideals, then out of either anger or apathy, their base will vote for the party that can do it better, Republicans, or not vote at all.

      I agree with a lot of people on Lemmy that the average American is an idiot, and our shortening attention spans coupled with our changing media diets isn’t helping with that, but I see these as features not bugs.

      Americans in general like their shiny toys, and one of the best ways to capture their attention is by politicians giving concessions and offering things that will benefit their lives. Think carrots on sticks more than sticks themselves.

      I will never stop hanging most of the blame on the Democratic party for leading us to today conclusion after Tuesday.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Yep, every time Dems can’t get enough votes from the left to win, because they aren’t “left/pure enough” for them, what they learn is to shift to the right to find votes.

      Whereas since voters on the right will always vote for the one with the R by their name even if they don’t think the candidate is “right enough”, their party learns that it doesn’t have to move to the left to find enough votes and stays to the right or moves even further to the right.

      • ...m...@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 hours ago

        …you don’t win over conservatives by offering light-conservatism, but the democratic party have run the same playbook since 1992…

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Mindless sheep sycophant party that abuses the system to stay relivent VS super-diverse big tent party than “takes the high road” and it is still almost 50/50…tells you where the people actually stand and how badly the broken system empowers the shitty minority. Oh, before “huurrrrddduuuurrrrr but popular vote dduuurrrrrrr”…that is how many people of each ideology VOTED not how many there are. Glad I could clarify the obvious for you smooth brain twits that think you have a point.

        • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The popular vote that trump won in addition to the electoral college? That popular vote? Democrats (the party apparatus) need to come to term with themselves and look in the mirror for answers as to why there’s a second trump term on the horizon.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The only ones that need to learn are the vile pieces of shit that chose to throw their vote away or not even vote. A politician doesnt give them all they want so they sacrifice the planet. Lowest of the low. Same kind of trash as maga

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        59 minutes ago

        Which do you think is better? Dems giving people what they want to earn their vote or trump winning?

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          Dems cant give people what they want because everyone wants different things.

          What do you think is better? Preventing fascism or doing nothing and watching a fascist get into power?

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            Medicare for all or universal healthcare is incredibly popular. Peace is also popular.

            • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              35 minutes ago

              Spectacular example of avoiding the question but answering it with it. You want to watch the fascism

      • khornechips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Would you prefer they DID vote for Trump? I voted for Harris because she was the only real option but after what the DNC keeps doing (see: fucking Bernie in the primaries and then not even having a primary this year) I really can’t blame anyone for not voting. The Dems need to have their come to Jesus and remember that the people don’t owe them anything.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I dont make a difference whether they voted for Trump or not. They both picked fascism. Primaries dont mean shit especially if they already have a president a power. It was a mistake to have Biden run again but that doesnt excuse not voting for democracy

      • Sonori@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Every single third party protest vote could have gone to Harris and she still would have heavily lost. She managed to even lose the damn popular vote by five million votes, despite Trump having a lower turnout than 2020.

        This wasn’t because people voted third party, this was because at a time when incumbents have seen massive pushback across the globe from Covid inflation and Biden was unpopular across the board she ran as completely the same as Biden but even more Right on the border.

        At a time when the politically disconnected working class families that make up the record trunout in 2020 were struggling with wage stagnation, erosion of Covid gains, and greedflation eroding their savings and pensions, four more years of the same but we’ll adopt even more Republican policies and look how many rich Republicans like us was never going to get the everperson off the damn couch.

        More of the same is not a good platform for ‘progressives’ during economic hardship, even if it was out of their control and less hardship than most peer nations.

        Even though Trump is a disaster for many of us, most people got though his first four years just fine, and don’t understand just how much damage he did or how much more he could do if the guardrails failed.

        Getting the general public out to vote requires giving them something they want to vote for, and when the biggest thing you can point to doing or wanting to do more of is some clean energy related tax breaks that is a major problem.

        Had the Dems impeached Clarence Thomas for his and his wife’s role in Jan 6, had Biden improved the immigration system like promised, had he provided free National Guard abortion clinics on federal land, had he made the FDA make puberty blockers and abortion medicine available by teleheath and mail, or indeed had any major victories in the last half of his term to show, we would not be here. Had they run AOC, Bernie, Waltz, or anyone at all who could articulate a platform beyond four more years of the same, we would not be here. Had Harris focused on how she could use left wing policy to fight the effects of late stage capitalism, we would not be here.

        This election was an unforced error of the highest consequences, and one brought about by a political party that was so confident that until he dies of old age every politically disinterested Amarican would be so scared by the threat of Trump that they would maintain an unprecedented level of voter turnout without them having to actually do or promise anything.

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well said. As soon as Harris started parading Biden around on campaign events and talking about “we love you Joe” I knew it was over. It doesn’t matter that a lot of the circumstances were out of his control, to many people Biden’s term is associated with hardship. The Dems had a unique opportunity to sidestep the issue by having Harris position herself as a separate candidate, distancing herself from the Biden administration and pushing a narrative of her having different and new ideas for the country. Instead they tried themselves to the status quo in a moment where the everyman is suffering and it pulled them down like a boat anchor.

          It’s a damn embarrassment, and the whole world is left weeping. Fucking hell.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I blame third party AND non voters. They and MAGA are all the same kind of scum who sacrificed your democracy.

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Then, you’ll deal with this over and over until America becomes a completely fascist nation. That’ll teach those third party and non-voters. At least you’ll have your moral high ground, right?

              • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Not yet, it’s not completely fascist yet, but with the way you’re acting, there’s not going to be any significant resistance towards the US becoming a completely fascist country since you’re more interested in blaming each other instead of learning from your mistakes and work together to be better. What a defeatist mindset you have.

                • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  It will be completely fascist in January. And its thanks to non voters. They deserve all that is coming.

              • Auli@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                They don’t care so yes it is on them also. Wasn’t it 10million plus less voters then last time.

            • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 hours ago

              There wont be a coalition with fascists. You had the vote between fascism and no fascism. If you choose that you dont want to vote for either you support fascism.

              • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Enjoy the unfettered fascism, then, since you refuse to even find allies to fight against it.

                • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Luckily I dont live in the US. But I have family there so I think its terrible people who didnt vote ruin their lifes and future like that. Non voters are no allies. They chose fascism. They are the enemies and there wont be another free election thanks to them and all the Maga garbage who are both on the same level

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it counts as satire, even if the headline is a completely true statement.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Colbert was satire when he just copied what Republicans were saying, with the obvious intentions of “Jesus Christ, do they even hear themselves?”

        The Onion can be satire now, and when “No way to prevent this, says the only country where this happens on a regular basis.”