I didn’t believe you, OP. I thought there’s no way, it’s exactly the kind of thing that would be made up. Like we all talk about accidentally streaming porn but it never actually happens.
But holy fuck, there’s images. There’s a screen recording. You can see one of the guys had a pup hood. I am completely shocked.
And yeah, even before he realized what was happening the chat had already come up with an excuse and he went with it. We live in a clown world.
I worked with a guy for a bit on a Helpdesk. He was our overnight guy and would generally work alone. The dude had a massive collection of movies and tv shows on his home server that he would remotely connect to and watch while in the office.
Well one day he leaves work after his shift. About an hour or so later the office is echoing with the screams and slaps of sex.
He left and forgot the logout and left the volumed turned to 11
we all talk about accidentally streaming porn but it never actually happens.
It happens. But unless it’s someone big, most streamers aren’t being recorded or have haters who want to get them banned and are able to scrub all evidence of it.
Evidently you aren’t aware that this is how all the anti-gay republican go down, time and again. reality is a parody of itself.
All men have prostates, prostates give the better orgasm, all self-serving egomaniacs always seek greater pleasure and will never apply principles they apply to others, to themselves, because that’s the purpose of power, the ability to flout laws. Everyone figures out they have a prostate eventually and then, if you’ve spent your life being an idiot about it, the bill comes due. It happens all the time, the world over. It’s so fucking boring it’s literally criminal.
No i always expected conservatives to be secretely gay, but accidentally streaming gay porn is so funny and so demonstrative that it sounds made up. Like it’s unquestionable proof of a common stereotype and the person also looks clumsy in the process, it’s like too good.
Fear and hatred on that irrational level almost exclusively comes from self shame.
Kind of weird to imply that selfish pleasure seeking leads to being gay… Seems more likely that when they learned the harmful social tradition that being gay is bad, they fixated on it because it was something they were “struggling” with so it became what their brains go to in morality talks and sticks out more among the other “sins”. It’s like all those horny teenagers that form abstinence clubs.
There is a difference between hitting the p spot and becoming gay. You can put a finger or dildo up there, or get a girl to peg you without watching gay porn.
Do you expect a red bloodeded alpha male conservative values republican to known that you can enjoy yourself as a straight man with your wife?
He can’t possibly be expected to masturbate to completion with some pathetic tradwife on the screen. He’s no beta-male cuck! Only 2 or more alpha males railing each other can produce the kind of testosterone-fueled intensity to make him climax.
puts an entirely new spin on the concept of the dickfighter.
I guess one thing ‘good’ about Mike Johnson is that he hasn’t been caught raping and sexually abusing young boys and men.
Look up Dennis Hastert.
pup hood
German Shepherd, you think?
Hey can we get some cope in chat please
Sorry, this is all the copium I could muster
They came up with an excuse so they could sit and watch with him
As a Jew so Jewy that I moderate c/Jewish, I can tell you for a fact that I personally use the mind control setting on my space laser to make Nick Fuentes think about sucking cock all day.
Those little hats are mind control transmitters, aren’t they?
Please. They’re called beanies and some come with propellers.
(If I had a dollar for every time some idiot called a yarmulke a beanie…)
You’re doing Yahweh’s work.
dang, I gotta seriously reconsider not being jewish. All these perks sure seem worth the trouble
Warning: You do have to cut off the tip of your penis.
My mil asked me to do that one. Never saw her again
Pshhh done. Next?
Now that’s commitment. At least it was done to me when I was a baby so I don’t remember it.
Dude I think you got the coordinates wrong, you hit me instead.
It’s a wide beam.
S’all good, maybe swing it past again next week, you know for calibration…
Thank you for your service
How many liters of children’s blood does that take?
Hey, Alex Jones!..remember asking Nick when he was gonna get married and have kids and you kept telling him how good looking he was and he kept deflecting the subject and telling you that it wasnt his priority? Remember that? Just last week? Remember?
You just couldn’t pick up the cues, could you?
Didn’t Alex Jones watch trans porn or something? Between this and that, you can wonder if there’s anything real in these people’s life. Must be hard to always pretend.
He got caught with trans porn tabs open on his browser. While it isn’t watching, still the same implication
Research!
I’m pretty sure that was his excuse lol
Trans-frog-porn, sure.
God that whole interview was pathetic. It was obvious Alex was trying to do the dad talk with someone who just did not buy in.
Knowledge Fight enjoyer detected
Red alert, red alert, red alert
I need- I need MONEY
BLARGH
Dan and Jordan
Thought the same thing
Wait, wasn’t it Nick Fuentes that said sleeping with men was less gay than sleeping with women or something? This is the weasely little fuckface with a voice like Ben Shapiro and a face like a twink fuckboi?
Not sure about the first half but the second is correct
lol I was apparently remembering the first part correctly too:
Fuentes complained about “people calling me gay because I’ve never had a girlfriend.”
“I think if anything — if anything — it makes me less gay. If anything, it makes me not gay — as opposed to less gay, not that there’s any gay, but it makes me not gay,” he argued.
Fuentes went on to describe how he has never been in a romantic relationship or had sex with a woman, but is “more heterosexual than anybody.”
“If we’re really being honest, never having a girlfriend, never having sex with a woman, really makes you more heterosexual, because honestly, dating women is gay,” he claimed.
Me, 10 years ago: haha, the onion
Me, now: haha, republicans
Me, 8 years ago: haha, dsp
Me, now: haha, republicans
disHonerable mention, Gavin McInnes putting a dildo up his own ass live.
I saw how you titled that link why did I click on it…
I mean the signs were there, starting a no women allowed club with your friends and calling it “Proud Boys” tbh it’s entirely our fault for not seeing this coming
Me, now: crying haha, Republicans more crying
Theres gay, then there’s eating a literal dumpling out of another guys ass.
It’s called purity culture, get with the times
Holy what? That last paragraph. Did he really say that?
I always figured his next step was announcing an onlyfans or appearing on blacked.
Hold up though. So nick definitely went offline as there was a break in the stream. Then his account started broadcasting full screen gay porn. Also there’s a telegram handle “groyprape” in the corner that wasn’t there before. I mean we already know his… Preferences, but this actually looks like someone got a hold of his api key.
Did you miss the /s or are you a nazi?
Ah yes, do you agree with my demonstrably false view of the world or are you a Nazi. Classic Hasan viewer energy.
Okay, let’s pretend someone stole his api and made him look like a hypocrite, why would it matter and why would you point that out? Being honorable towards a nazi is usually a nazi protecting a fellow nazi.
Have you ever heard Fuentes speak? He is an admitted nazi, not someone who hides it.
I point it out because I dislike seeing the side I identify with using the tactics of the side I don’t identify with.
If the left wants to use misinformation and lies they are little better than Nazis spreading blood libel.
Additionally this strategy is incredibly dumb in his particular instance. When you misinform you are gambling that people viewing the claim won’t attempt to look at the evidence. In this case the evidence is a single clip that is an obvious example of a hack. Many people are likely to investigate it. Many people on the fence will think you are liars, all Nick’s supporters will reinforce their belief that the other side are liars, and many of your supporters will think you are liars.
Well we gays still don’t want him
The straights don’t blame the gays!
This shit stain is pretty disgusting
PS with that being said, it seems with this much gay representation on the republican side, we would see some more “tolerance”
image of a press release i am not sure how credible (cant verify what weather this was only streamed to one of the 3 platforms) this is and I’m all for bashing on a nazi but if what hes saying is true then we probably shouldn’t spread this as gospel
It would seem even more nonsensical that if he was streaming to 3 platforms at once using a single application, that a hacker could just hack a single one of those in-progress OBS streams and replace the content while leaving the others alone, without rebooting the stream or affecting the rest of OBS. But I have no clue what happened to be clear, I just don’t see how he was streaming to three places using a single OBS and somehow 1/3 of the output changes. Because it’s not like if just his Cozy got hacked, that would somehow allow a hacker to step into an-progress pre-recorded stream and take it over, you’d have to close the existing stream coming from whatever “webapp” he is referring to and start a new one, which is not what it sounds like happened. I’m not a OBS, Cozy, or streaming expert by any means, just my opinions based on this super limited info.
the stream had ended on all 3 hosting sites and then on 1 of the hosting sites a stream started up after seconds of the stream ending. it depicted a shock style compilation of gay porn. it was the type of video used to troll and not the sort for getting off to
I don’t support Nick Fanta or any other political streaming mouthpieces, but just as you said this sounds like a plausible explanation and if true then we’d all be better off acknowledging the truth rather than running with sensationalist lies.
That is to say, the people that downvoted your comment are children who can’t employ critical thinking to see the uncertainty here-- or perhaps they know something we don’t.
Regardless, fuck this Nazi streamer in particular, and all like him. But goddamn people make sure you have your facts straight otherwise you make your opponents look more credible than yourself you tools. Seriously, you make everyone who supports your view look like idiots by being blatantly obvious idiots.
he sounds like a class A twat tbf.
saw a clip of the stream and seems very much like he was hacked as the video was not normal porn but a compilation akin to fail/shock videos.
was it just the porn, or was there anything that would indicate he was watching it? Because yeah it sounds very much like he might have been hacked based on the description of it only occuring on the one platform-- if it didn’t go through OBS, then it obviously was not him forgetting to turn off his stream…
but yeah, again, the dude has always sounded like a twat regardless
Telegram link in top right of the stream, and just porn full screen with multiple clips one after another, mostly fisting but hard to tell with the video being censored and seems to be sped up considerably.
Funny enough though I did see earlier reports of viewers seeing a tab open in the nazis browser linking to trans porn this was last year but ive not looked too much into that yet.
You’re admonishing us for not giving the (incredibly cliched) claims of an literal unabashed nazi the benefit of the doubt, but we’re the tools…? The man got caught looking at gay porn without disabling all his connections and now he must have been ‘hacked’ by someone who “most likely isn’t Israeli intelligence”. Take a look at yourself, man. He’s a NAZI. He doesn’t need or deserve your bizarrely moralizing support.
I am admonishing you for not acknowledging uncertainty that contributes to the credibility of your argument. It doesn’t matter who your opponent is-- if you use a false argument against them, you tarnish the credibility of your side.
It’s not that I disagree with anything you said, except this. “If what hes saying is true then we probably shouldn’t spread this as gospel”
Why not? Fuck em. If John Q public knows who this guy is, it’s probably his connections to Kanye and Alex Jones. Maybe MTG. It’s up to the audience to scratch beneath the surface. If they do and they let people misrepresenting a nazi watching gay porn effect their opinion on fucking anything then John q public is a piece of shit desperate for both sides trash. If that’s the case, fuck em. That’s worst case scenario, best case scenario is more make up on all those fucking clowns.
Fuck em indeed but spreading falsities will only discredit the left. Besides character assignation is low brow fascist behaviour.
All reactionary politics is sexual pathology example #349598927
Methinks the computer protests too much. How’d conservatives make a gay chat bot?
I’m not a big fan of this line of thinking, because it very quickly leads into “Every homophobe is a closeted homosexual”, which is some genuinely insane levels of victim blaming when you actually think about it. Are we seriously going to suggest that queer people are to blame for our own oppression? And for that matter, if homophobia is only enacted by closeted queer people, then what made them closeted in the first place? In a world where no straight person is every homophobic, no queer person would ever have felt any shame about who they are.
Strawman argument and stupid
Please learn what that term actually means.
it very quickly leads into “Every homophobe is a closeted homosexual”, which is some genuinely insane levels of victim blaming when you actually think about it.
I was being intentionally hyperbolic for comedic effect rather than trying to be totally nuanced.
There’s plenty of examples of people who are outwardly liberal being homophobic- it happens all the time towards people who are seen as ‘not on their team’ ie how often Democrats (online, comedians, etc) will mock someone like lindsey graham because he’s a bit queeny.
You also see it when liberals do stuff like portray Putin and Trump kissing because men kissing bad, right?
To be clear, this wasn’t a “call out” or whatever the fuck the kids call it now. I just think it’s really important to always interrogate the implications of our arguments. Things we say in jest can still reinforce dangerous or damaging ideas.
Historically the church and then law made them closeted in the first place!
It wasn’t always abnormal for (wealthy) men to have male concubines or lovers- until the Abrahamic religions that is
The cool thing about (religious) propaganda is it doesn’t have to be true, it’s only biased on faith. Faith that these white men know the divine and will stop you from having a fearful afterlife. They don’t need proof, just faith. Few people get butthurt no one wants to hurt their butts and they ban it for everyone
Are we seriously going to suggest that queer people are to blame for our own oppression?
No…?
I’ve never seen anyone make this claim.
It makes some sense that the people who violently bottle up all of their impulses, who are then the most unhappy about it, just to fit in with their right wing community are then the ones who A) think about it the most often, and B) imagine that the “devil’s temptation” and the repression thereof is normal for most people, when it really isn’t.
—But this isn’t the same as saying that only gay people are homophobic. It’s just a kind of pathology that leads to being the most militant about it. You end up working the hardest to fit in because you’re the most at risk of losing that.
But even more than that, I’m not sure I believe straightness is really “real.” If everyone is “a little bit queer”, and conservatives are the only ones rejecting that, then this is just an indication that their ideas don’t really pan out. They would claim straightness is normal, default, but they can’t hold themselves to it; it’s not actually possible.
So, those are two different answers to the one problem you’ve put forward, but in either case, or neither, I don’t really see this as the gays attacking themselves. The right wing is just kinda wack, you know?
If you’ve never seen anyone make the claim that every homophobe is a closeted homosexual, then congratulations, welcome to the Internet, this must be a really exciting first day for you.
And if you read it a little more carefully, you’ll notice that I was not accusing the previous commenter of making that claim. I said that their argument felt dangerously close to making that claim. It’s important to interrogate the implications of our arguments, even (in fact, especially) when they’re made in jest or for the purposes of mockery. It’s all too easy to get ourselves into mindsets that seem reasonable, but actually have really dangerous implications.
If you’ve never seen anyone make the claim that every homophobe is a closeted homosexual
No. This one:
queer people are to blame for our own oppression
This is a dangerous implication, but I don’t see it being made. In this thread. And elsewhere. I don’t see people, even conservatives, making this accusation.
Because no one makes that accusation directly. I’m really trying not to be a dick here, but you do know what “implication” means, right?
If every homophobe is a closeted queer person then that automatically implies that homophobia is only perpetuated by queer people. That’s not what people think they’re saying when they make that claim, but it is the only logical conclusion.
And just because you didn’t think about the implications of something, doesn’t change the fact that they’re there.
Your interpretation implies that the queer element of the oppressive queer conservative is the more substantive one.
I think most people correctly recognize it is the conservative element that is the more oppressive one.
I think even conservatives recognize this because the only time they don’t want credit for the nasty things they do is when they’d get in trouble. They like the oppression. They want the credit.
So, you are hearing people blame queer people. And I am hearing them blame conservatives.
A queer person is fine. Naturally. A queer conservative, well… what happened, right?
The fear you have then, I suppose, is that someone might hear the word “queer” or “lgbt” and think “Ah. You must be a conservative. Too bad you banned gay marriage for yourselves, hm?”, which is something I’m really trying to impress on you here: does not grok with me.
I don’t see this implication you’re worried about being reinforced—that means reflected in the other things people do and say—because this idea of the self-inflicted wound is not useful to anyone’s political ends.
Granted, maybe someday in the future, conservatives will try to use ideas like this to absolve themselves, the same way holocaust denial works.
But today, I only see people pointing out a strong hypocrisy among the conservative community. One that is conservative-self imposed: by living so inauthentically, they are placing themselves into a pressure cooker.
And further, because the ideal conservative lifestyle is so strict, as authoritarians are won’t to do, everyone is placed in this pressure cooker.
Heterosexuality, a different sexual pathology, is expressed very conservatively in the incel community.
Like, on some level, you are arguing against the adage “everything is about sex, and sex is about power,” which, as far as I know, is pretty well regarded. It’s not a secret that the right wing is insanely insecure.
I am sorry to have gotten a bit condescending here, but then I should be asking why you are giving me lessons on subtext.
I’ve looked at your comment history, you seem like a smart person. I don’t really understand where this is coming from.
If all black birds are ravens, then if a bird is black, by definition it is a raven.
If all homophobes are queer, then by definition all homophobia is enacted by people who are queer.
Therefore, the statement “every homophobe is a closeted queer person” automatically excludes all straight people from being capable of homophobia. The moment a straight person does something homophobic, they must, according to this line of thinking, actually be a closeted queer person.
And while the intent is to point out conservative hypocrisy, the effect, very subtly, is to craft a universe where straight people are absolved of any culpability for the existence of homophobia. It becomes, by definition, a queer problem.
I am not arguing against any of the things you seem to think I’m arguing against, nor am I making any of the points you seem to think I’m making. Everything in your previous comment is a response to an invention that exists solely in your head. I am making the point that I have just stated, as plainly as it is possible to state it. If you’re still not getting it, sit back, have a cup of coffee, and read it again.
I think usually when I see that idea, is more along the lines of “doth protest too much, methinks.” A lot of the most vocal homophobes are at least slightly bi or at least seem to like either , partly just because of how common being at least slightly bi is and they go out of their way to deny it. That can be true and still much more casual homophobia by straight people can still be the most common source of homophobia and what pushes people to extremes in their denial. But I also wonder if the argument is sometimes made in hopes of making people afraid of being too homophobic in fear of being seen as gay.
Shame is a hell of a motivator
Is everything Republican rail against just self loathing projection?
A few of them are true Captain Planet cartoon villains in their hearts (McConnel, MangoBastard), but for the most part yes.
Every single member of Donald’s cabinet was comically evil. Like the sort of appointments that would happen in a comic book so that the reader knows for certain they are completely corrupt.
I once heard someone try to say Captain Planet was actually harmful to discussions on environmentalism because it portrayed the “bad guys” aka oil barons, loggers etc. as physically deformed monster men who were cartoonishly Evil with a capital E, and people who watched the show as a child treat people who work at power plants or refineries or whatever as if they’re Just Evil and don’t have room to debate that stable grid power is exceptionally important.
But no turns out they genuinely are physically deformed monster men who are cartoonishly Evil with a capital E.
The evidence is mounting. Pretty sure this has been researched by psychologists, does anyone know of a good book about this?
I’m yet to see a radical be against something and it not be because they hate themselves. Either they want others to suffer like them, or to struggle like they had to, or to not let the “unworthy” be more similar to them.
- You can’t be gay! - probably closeted gay
- you can’t work from home! - probably is a bad worker if noone is watching over them
- You can’t abort! - probably did it themselves and regretted or are the result of a failed attempt
- You can’t have x! - probably has x and doesn’t want others to be equal to them
- You can’t use drugs! - probably uses drugs
I’m pretty sure my mother, who is staunchly against abortion, is only against it because my grandmother offered to pay to abort me and my mother refused the offer and regrets it. She was 18 and her aunt then refused to pay for her college because she got knocked up. But you get what you get, and she got a gay son. 🤷🏻♂️
The Nazis persecuted gays and sent them to concentration camps.
and the Allies left them there
Why do people keep saying this bullshit lol.
Allies weren’t leaving gays in concentration camps. Persecution at home is an entirely different story.
At the end of the war, the majority of homosexuals were freed from camps in both parts of divided Germany. However, the homophobia directed against them by the public remained strong. Article 175—the basis for sending thousands of innocent people to concentration camps—remained in force in the DDR until 1967, and in West Germany until 1969. There were some American and British lawyers who demanded that homosexuals convicted under Article 175 serve out their full sentences. For instance, if someone had been sentenced to eight years and served five years of the sentence in prison followed by three years in a concentration camp, the lawyers demanded that the person return to prison to serve out three years. The number of people forced to “complete” their sentences in this way is not known. To this day, no financial compensation has been paid to the victims of Nazi homosexual policies, despite the fact that the German government offered compensation to victims of Jewish ethnicity, political prisoners, and other groups that survived the concentration camps. Only the homosexuals were passed over. Many people deny that the homosexuals have a right to any such compensation, stating that victims with an alternative sexual orientation were justly imprisoned, and “had no one but themselves to blame.”
Significant numbers of the homosexuals who survived the war found themselves unable to return to their families or hometowns following their camp experiences. There were many reasons for this. Above all, however, shame and the fear of being stigmatized motivated homosexuals to change not only their addresses but everything else that could have been associated with their earlier lives.
The attempts that homosexuals made to conceal their pasts in the camps combined with the attitudes prevailing in postwar Europe to make it difficult for researchers to find many of those who had been sentenced under Article 175. As one of those researchers, Richard Plant, noted in his book The Pink Triangle: “Despite the fact that they no longer had to wear the pink triangles that designated them, they remained marked to the end of their lives.”
…? So your response to “look how fucked Nazis are” is “so are others’”? So confused why this is upvoted.
Its getting upvoted because it illustrates that sometimes the “goodguys” are actually really awful too and you shouldn’t trust them just because they are against the “badguys”.
Now noticing who I’m replying to it is almost self parody that you in particular missed this point.
I could sort of get the point (which is obvious), it’s just that the comment almost sounds like “the Nazis weren’t even as bad”.
Now noticing who I’m replying to it is almost self parody that you in particular missed this point.
This is cryptic, care to elaborate?
The English chemically castrated the guy who broke the Nazi codes that let us win the war, he killed himself over it and England took 60 years to say “my bad”.
he killed himself over it
There’s some doubt over that. Accidental inhalation due to some of the lab equipment in his room has some compelling arguments too. The wikipedia article has the details.
Any link to article or search keywords?
Alan Turing. Yes. That Alan Turing.
Ah damn, No link required
The personal life section of the Alan Turing wikipedia article
Say his name! Alan Turing!
Maybe it was sex camps because they like it so much.
Eh this is pretty distasteful, they were murdered, gassed, and starved to death.
Hey guys, remember. We have to support this gay Hispanic man through this hard time. He just came out of the closet after all. Kek.
Ask Milo how well that worked out for him 😊
Man, Milo’s probably being accepted so much right now. I wonder if Nick will start supporting trans rights after this? Lmao
Isn’t Milo claiming his gay was prayed away? That’s why he can’t do porn with Kanye I think.